2009
DOI: 10.1215/00166928-42-3-4-99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescuing Interpretation with Mark Danielewski: The Genre of Scholarship inHouse of Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of House of Leaves usually focus on its postmodernist aspects (Hayles 2002;Graulund 2006;Belletto 2009;Hemmingson 2011), its commentary on a post-print, digitalized media environment (Hayles 2002;Pressman 2006), or its treatment of scholarship, authority, and authenticity (Hayles 2002;Graulund 2006;Belletto 2009;Hemmingson 2011). Pressman, for instance, views House of Leaves as "the central node in a network of multimedia, multiauthored forms that collectively comprise its narrative" (2006: 107).…”
Section: Lost In the (Textual) Labyrinth: The Multimodal Transmedia N...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of House of Leaves usually focus on its postmodernist aspects (Hayles 2002;Graulund 2006;Belletto 2009;Hemmingson 2011), its commentary on a post-print, digitalized media environment (Hayles 2002;Pressman 2006), or its treatment of scholarship, authority, and authenticity (Hayles 2002;Graulund 2006;Belletto 2009;Hemmingson 2011). Pressman, for instance, views House of Leaves as "the central node in a network of multimedia, multiauthored forms that collectively comprise its narrative" (2006: 107).…”
Section: Lost In the (Textual) Labyrinth: The Multimodal Transmedia N...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael Hemmingson, for instance, makes his Danielewski-inspired self-reflexive ficticism patent in one of his 20-plus endnotes: "The reader will take notice that, emulating House of Leaves, I am using footnotes within footnotes, which is often frowned upon in the academic community -that is, for the critic to take on the style of the work under scrutiny" (2011, p. 285). (Also see House of Leaves "ficticism" scholarship by Aghoro, 2012;Askin, 2012;Belletto, 2009;Bemong, 2003;Cox, 2006;Chanen, 2007;Dawson, 2012;Greve, 2012;Hagood, 2012;Hansen, 2004;Hayles, 2002;Huber, 2012;Jones, 2004;Letzler, 2012;Shastri, 2006;Slocombe, 2005;Söder, 2012;Taylor, 2013;and Toth, 2013. Admittedly, many, but not all, of these are collected in Polhman's edited volume Revolutionary Leaves [2012].…”
Section: Dr Celia Lam Editor-in-chief 25 July 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readings of House of Leaves have engaged with its images of maternity, its parodies of scholarship and engagement with concerns of being (Cox 2006;Belletto 2009;Slocombe 2005) but have tended, with significant reservations, to highlight issues of hyperlinks, formatting, online release and immersion in multimedia networks: the 'dangers of hypertext' and its attempts, in the face of postmodern superficiality, to make a 'recovery of' and 'return to' reality and truth claims (Brick 2004;Toth 2013: 182; see also Hagler 2004;Pressman 2006;Spooner 2006: 41-47). Leading the way, Hayles connects the novel's inclusion of multiple types of mediation to attempts to 'save' the subject, lost to postmodern and post-human simulations, through a recuperation of literary forms and techniques.…”
Section: Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%