A search of the influenza virus genome database reveals anomalies associated with a nonnegligible number of submitted sequences. There are many pairs of viral segments that are very close to each other in nucleotide sequence but relatively far apart in reported time of isolation, resulting in an abnormally low evolutionary rate. Also, some sequences show clear evidence of apparent homologous recombination, a process normally assumed to be extremely rare or nonexistent in this virus. These findings may point to surprising new biology but are perhaps more readily explained by stock contamination or other errors in the sequencing laboratories.In the last few years, an extraordinary amount of influenza virus genomic sequence has been submitted to publicly available databases (see, e.g., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes /FLU/FLU.html, http://www.flu.lanl.gov, and http://influenza .genomics.org.cn). For instance, there are now over 3,300 full genome sets in the NCBI's rapidly growing Influenza Virus Resource. To our knowledge, no systematic attempt has been made to assess the quality of sequence data in this and similar collections. Our observations show that a fraction of the sequences in the database exhibit anomalous properties that point to either radically new biology or, more likely, problems with the data. As a first example, we consider the rate of nucleotide substitution in the influenza A virus. This rate has been previously estimated at 0.001 to 0.007 per nucleotide per year. (There have been many studies analyzing influenza virus evolutionary rates in different segments and different hosts; see, among others, references 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 16.) Using the most conservative (lowest) estimate, we still find many pairs of virus segments that are far closer to each other in nucleotide space than would randomly occur in a Poisson process with this evolutionary rate, given the difference in time of isolation. Such sequences appear to be effectively "frozen in time." For instance, the PB2 segments of isolates A/duck/Taiwan/0526/1972(H6N1) and A/chicken/Taiwan/G23/87(H6N1) differ in only 1 nucleotide position out of 2,283 aligned nucleotides, whereas the expected number of differences, at 0.0015 substitution per nucleotide per year, would be ϳ48 for 15 years. For a null Poisson process, this gives an extremely low P value of 6.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ20