2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics (ISMCR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ismcr47492.2019.8955663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescue Boat Path Planning in Flooded Urban Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some emergency scenarios, such as flooded coastal areas, combine multiple of the above mediums making the deployment of autonomous robots even more challenging. For instance, in [152], the authors describe path planning techniques for rescue vessels in flooded urban environments, where many of the limitations of urban navigation are added to the already limited navigation of surface robots in shallow waters.…”
Section: Planning For Different Robots: Uavs Ugvs Uuvs and Usvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some emergency scenarios, such as flooded coastal areas, combine multiple of the above mediums making the deployment of autonomous robots even more challenging. For instance, in [152], the authors describe path planning techniques for rescue vessels in flooded urban environments, where many of the limitations of urban navigation are added to the already limited navigation of surface robots in shallow waters.…”
Section: Planning For Different Robots: Uavs Ugvs Uuvs and Usvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the tether joints are considered revolute and frictionless, there is no coupling between the tether's rotational motion and the UAV and buoy's rotational dynamics, whereas their translational dynamics are coupled through (9). Additionally, as can be deduced by inspecting the elements of (35), the UAV and buoy's rotational dynamics are independent of each other, and can still be described by the dynamic models of their individual systems in (27) and (21), respectively. This is further elaborated in Appendix D. Given this, the tethered UAV−buoy system coupled dynamics can be represented by the first fives states: x b , y b , z b , α, and ϕ, which are independent of other rigid body orientation states that concern either the UAV's or the buoy's dynamics alone.…”
Section: The Tethered Uav−buoy System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further elaborated in Appendix D. Given this, the tethered UAV−buoy system coupled dynamics can be represented by the first fives states: x b , y b , z b , α, and ϕ, which are independent of other rigid body orientation states that concern either the UAV's or the buoy's dynamics alone. Hereafter, we limit the representation of the coupled system to the first five state variables mentioned above, while the UAV and buoy's rotational dynamics can still be described by η 2,u in ( 27) and η 2,b in (21), respectively. The inertia matrix for the coupled system is explicitly represented as M 1−5 = [M 1 ; M 2 ; M 3 ; M 4 ; M 5 ], where:…”
Section: The Tethered Uav−buoy System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations