2020
DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1467-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescue and quality control of sub-daily meteorological data collected at Montevergine Observatory (Southern Apennines), 1884–1963

Abstract: Abstract. Here we present the rescue of sub-daily meteorological observations collected from 1884 to 1963 at Montevergine Observatory, located in the Southern Apennines in Italy. The recovered dataset consists of 3-daily observations of the following atmospheric variables: dry-bulb temperature, wet-bulb temperature, water vapour pressure, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, cloud type, cloud cover, rainfall, snowfall and precipitation type. The data, originally available only as paper-based records, have … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The historical snow observations analysed in this study have been manually collected in the Montevergine Observatory (40.936502°N, 14.729150°E), a mountain site located at 1280 m above sea level in Southern Apennines in Italy. Specifically, snow depth (SD) measurements were collected on daily basis during the period from December 1931 to November 2008, with a few interruptions mainly located in the 1960s (Capozzi et al 2020). Unfortunately, the Observatory has no longer been manned since 2008 and the collection of several variables, including the snow depth, has been interrupted.…”
Section: In-situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical snow observations analysed in this study have been manually collected in the Montevergine Observatory (40.936502°N, 14.729150°E), a mountain site located at 1280 m above sea level in Southern Apennines in Italy. Specifically, snow depth (SD) measurements were collected on daily basis during the period from December 1931 to November 2008, with a few interruptions mainly located in the 1960s (Capozzi et al 2020). Unfortunately, the Observatory has no longer been manned since 2008 and the collection of several variables, including the snow depth, has been interrupted.…”
Section: In-situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The "key input" approach is slower but has the lower error rate (Capozzi, 2020). After each month of data entry, the digitized data have been cross-checked with the original source values in order to identify and The aim of quality control (QC) is to check the continuity and reliability of geomagnetic observation data.…”
Section: Data Digitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The "key input" approach is slower but has the lower error rate (Capozzi et al, 2020). After each month of data entry, we cross checked the digitized data with the original source values in order to identify and remove transcription errors.…”
Section: Data Digitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The geomagnetic jerks are due to interactions of the core field and the rapid time-varying core flow" (Kuang and Tangborn, 2011). Since Malin and Hodder (1982), Courtillot and Le Mouël (1984) discovered the geomagnetic jerk in 1969, 10 jerks have been detected in observatories from 1933 to 2020, of which 1969, 1978(Alexandrescu et al, 1996), 1991(De Michelis et al, 1998), 1999(Mandea et al, 2000Zhang et al, 2008a), 2003(Mandea and Olsen, 2007Feng et al, 2018;He et al, 2019(Kotzé, 2010, and 2014 (Brown et al, 2016;Kloss and Finlay, 2019;Finlay et al, 2016;Kang et al, 2020) were global events. In addition, there were two local events which occurred in 1949 (Mandea et al, 2000) and 2011 (Chulliat and Maus, 2014;Kotzé and Korte, 2016).…”
Section: Application Examples Of Ssh Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%