2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescaling of three-parameter equations of state: PC-SAFT and SPHCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well known, the original version of PC‐SAFT 7 cannot fit the critical and the sub‐critical data simultaneously . In addition, this model is affected by certain numerical pitfalls .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well known, the original version of PC‐SAFT 7 cannot fit the critical and the sub‐critical data simultaneously . In addition, this model is affected by certain numerical pitfalls .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should only be noticed that the rescaled simplified PC-SAFT [24] does not exhibit an improvement in comparison with the original version. Nevertheless the fact that PC-SAFT, in spite of its very high-polynomial order, typically generates the unrealistic phase equilibria at relatively low temperatures [15] should not be neglected.…”
Section: Pc-saft [14]mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The latter phenomenon may seriously affect their accuracies in predicting properties of heavy compounds such as ILs and their mixtures [49][50][51]. In addition, SAFT models typically cannot represent critical pressures, temperatures, and saturated liquid densities in a simultaneously accurate manner [52,53]. To solve all these problems, CP-PC-SAFT [43] majorly revised the initial version of PC-SAFT [45].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%