2018
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2018.07.mwsf-212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resampling Forgery Detection Using Deep Learning and A-Contrario Analysis

Abstract: The amount of digital imagery recorded has recently grown exponentially, and with the advancement of software, such as Photoshop or Gimp, it has become easier to manipulate images. However, most images on the internet have not been manipulated and any automated manipulation detection algorithm must carefully control the false alarm rate. In this paper we discuss a method to automatically detect local resampling using deep learning while controlling the false alarm rate using a-contrario analysis. The automated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several learning-based methods achieve similar goals, either by directly detecting resampling [22] or the resampling factor [23], or indirectly via camera-based image forgery localization [24] or the detection of image splicing [25]. However, learning-based methods are sensitive to mismatches between training and test data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several learning-based methods achieve similar goals, either by directly detecting resampling [22] or the resampling factor [23], or indirectly via camera-based image forgery localization [24] or the detection of image splicing [25]. However, learning-based methods are sensitive to mismatches between training and test data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the reported literature investigations concerning image tamper identification, some of them are focused mainly on using deep learning and neural network techniques, but they still suffer from some problems. For example, literature investigations [Bayar and Stamm (2016) ;Flenner, Peterson, Bunk et al (2018); Cui, McIntosh and Sun (2018)] have applied deep learning techniques for image tamper identification, which were found to have the ability to solve the single tampering problem, but they could not solve the problem of detecting image splicing behavior. Furthermore, some methods were proposed in the literature [Cozzolino and Verdoliva (2016); Bondi, Lameri, Güera et al (2017)] to solve the image splicing problem, but they were based on some certain assumptions and thus greatly reduced the general applicability of the algorithms.…”
Section: Survey Of Previous Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to interpolation resampling introduces periodic correlation between the pixels. The CNN-based tampering detection methodologies shows good translational invariance to produce spatial maps across different segment of multimedia content, and certain artifacts are well-learned using resampling feature sets [27]; which can be utilized to locate tampered segments [28], [29]. From extensive, it can be seen resampling feature detection of hybrid attacks within copy-clones attacks is a challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%