2013
DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2013.784663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rereading the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Plurality and Contestation, Not Consensus

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As origens do conceito moderno de DH são um reflexo do Holocausto, ocorrido na II Guerra Mundial. Ao término do conflito, criou-se a ONU, em 1945, e, posteriormente, a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos, em 1948 (Hoover, 2013;Muchlinski, 2001). Para o movimento Anistia Internacional (2021), "[...] não existe uma definição única de Direitos Humanos, mas comum a todas as abordagens é a convicção de que eles são fundamentais para vivermos com dignidade como seres humanos".…”
Section: Negócios E Direitos Humanosunclassified
“…As origens do conceito moderno de DH são um reflexo do Holocausto, ocorrido na II Guerra Mundial. Ao término do conflito, criou-se a ONU, em 1945, e, posteriormente, a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos, em 1948 (Hoover, 2013;Muchlinski, 2001). Para o movimento Anistia Internacional (2021), "[...] não existe uma definição única de Direitos Humanos, mas comum a todas as abordagens é a convicção de que eles são fundamentais para vivermos com dignidade como seres humanos".…”
Section: Negócios E Direitos Humanosunclassified
“…The drafting process was generally marked by numerous political, cultural, ideological, religious, and gender conflicts (Adami, 2017). The deliberations produced a document that reflects this plurality: it is based on consensus as much as on ambiguity, contestation, and even omission (Adami, 2017; Hoover, 2013). In the final decision about the endorsement of the UDHR in the UN General Assembly in December 1948, of the then 58 member states 48 states voted in favor of the declaration (none voted against it), 33 of which were non-Western.…”
Section: Are Human Rights Western?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic pluralism entails contradicting and pluralistic struggles. As discussed with regard to the institutionalization of human rights, many such struggles consist of contradictions, contestation, and ambiguities (Hoover, 2013). In effect, they may be strengthening as well as weakening human rights.…”
Section: Why Does the Question Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…56 Th e drafting of the UDHR included delegates from over sixty countries, representing diff erent and sometimes agonistic religious and non-religious belief systems. 57 Th e over two hundred UN sessions where the declaration was being debated and discussed were open for media coverage and hundreds of NGOs were present to lobby (for example for the inclusion of womens' human rights). Th e wording in the UDHR was being stripped down through the drafting process, taking away all direct or indirect cultural, religious and ethnic references to God and particular beliefs -so that the delegates, coming from agonistic belief systems, could agree on the same text.…”
Section: Rights -By Whom and For Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%