Requirements processing for building design: a systematic review

Pegoraro, Camila; Paula, Istefani Carísio de

doi:10.1590/0103-6513.212116

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Understanding project context, identification of stakeholders, and systematic capture of client needs and expectations [35,38,[46][47][48][49] [ 37,41,44,50] Analyse Interpretation of user needs, which are translated into explicit requirements [35,38,46,48,49] [ 37,41,44,50] Structure Definition of categories, organized in hierarchical levels, which group different types of requirements, such as space, components, and type of performance [48,49,51,52] [ 13,37,39,41] Translate Translation of requirements into solution-neutral specifications [35,46,47,49] [ 13,37,39,41] Store Storing all requirements in a repository [35,53] [ 7,13,27,54] Prioritise Identifying the most important requirements for different interest groups which need to be considered in product development [46] [ 26,37,41,…”

Section: Identifymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Building Information Modelling to Manage Client Requirements in Social Housing Projects

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a set of guidelines for using Building Information Modelling (BIM) to manage client requirements in the context of social housing projects. A process model representing main activities involved in requirements management has been devised, as well as nine constructs that can be used for assessing the effectiveness of using BIM for client requirements management. The process of managing and modelling clients’ requirements is important to improve value generation, considering the limited resources usually available for social housing projects, as well as the need to deal with the diversity of user profiles. The use of BIM-based tools to support this process can potentially improve the performance of those projects in terms of environmental and social sustainability. Design Science Research was the methodological approach adopted in this investigation. The main outcome of this study, the set of guidelines, emerged from an empirical study carried out in a social housing project from Brazil. This study explores the managerial perspective of client requirements modelling, proposing practical contributions, such as understanding the challenges of managing requirements in social housing projects, and theoretical contributions, such as descriptions of the activities involved in client requirements management and their interactions, and constructs for assessing BIM-based solutions for that problem.

show abstract

Section: Identifymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Building Information Modelling to Manage Client Requirements in Social Housing Projects

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Defining what 'value' means to a client within a particular context by bring the project stakeholders together and producing a clear statement of the project's objectives Samset and Volden [46] Project Governance The processes, systems, and regulations that the financing party must have in place to ensure that projects are successful ul Musawir, Serra [40] Benefit A flow of value that occurs when customers use project outputs Benefits Realisation Management A set of processes that ensure that projects, programs, and portfolios embed the requirements of business strategies into business-as-usual, in order to create value in a meaningful and sustainable manner Pegoraro and Paula [47] Requirement A statement that prescribes features that a product or service must have to satisfy demands or to achieve project stakeholders' goals Design Solution decision or action is chosen to meet the design requirements, which must be limited by the specifications…”

Section: Value Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hu [102] Case Study Construction Wang, Zhang [91] Evaluative Study Construction Liao, Liao [128] Evaluative Study Construction Volk, Luu [103] Case Study Construction Eleftheriadis, Duffour [129] Evaluative Study Construction Thew and Sutcliffe [76] Evaluative Study IT Han, Li [130] Exploratory Case Study Engineering Design Müller, Ludwig [48] Evaluative Study IT ul Musawir, Serra [40] Qualitative Survey Study Construction Pegoraro and Paula [47] Systematic Literature Review Construction Rodrigues and Freire [87] Evaluative Study Construction Carrizo, Dieste [95] Evaluative Study IT Abeywickrama and Ovaska [131] Literature Review IT Goh and Loosemore [132] Qualitative Survey Study Construction Koh [133] Evaluative Study Construction Papadonikolaki, Verbraeck [134] mixed method approach plus caste study Construction Akcay, Dikmen [135] Construction Sinesilassie, Tabish [136] Qualitative Survey Study Construction Locatelli, Mariani [67] Evaluative Case Study Construction Lin, Zeng [137] Qualitative Survey Study Construction Cavka, Staub-French [63] Qualitative Survey Study Construction Sleiman, Hempel [138] Evaluative Study Construction Cardenas, Voordijk [139] Evaluative Study Construction Wiese, Ré [140] Evaluative Study IT Hastie, Sutrisna [141] Case Study, Survey Construction Sanderson and Winch [142] Evaluative Study Construction Mok, Shen [56] Case Study Construction Samset [143] Literature Review Construction Eckart, McPhee [144] Literature Review Construction Saoud, Omran [145] Case Study, Survey Construction Clarke, Gleeson [146] Evaluative Study Construction Oraee, Hosseini [147] Systematic Literature Review Construction Vernet and Coste…”

Section: Geopolitics Economics Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Front End Projects Benefits Realisation from a Requirements Management Perspective—A Systematic Literature Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent notable emergence of a body of research in requirements management on one hand and benefits realisation has contributed to addressing a growing need for improved performance in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) projects. However, front end design (FED) as one of the vital processes in the project life cycle and delivery has attracted limited research to date within this understanding. This paper aims to map current evidence on requirements management in facilitating benefits realisation from an FED perspective. This is to bring about an updated and unified position on requirements management for its impact on design decision making. A systematic review of the literature covering the last ten years (2008–2018) aims first to build understanding and support identification of these emergent conceptual positions and secondly underscore essential requirements and their categorisations that impact on design discourse in FED. One hundred sixty-one peer-reviewed journal papers in the areas of benefits realisation and/or requirements management and/or FED based are identified on a pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-six requirements are identified as important in influencing use case changes important in design decision making broadly grouped into nine major categories. Following analysis, this research finds little evidence supporting an integrated requirements management practice and understanding to support design decision making. The research further finds bias in current research discourse towards four requirements categories (technical, economics, governance and environment); and 14 requirements, dominated by three strategic values, collaboration and project governance, with over 80% share of literature. The least 14 requirements such as “flow of spaces, social status/aspiration, mobility and integrated design” among others only account for less than 10% of literature. The authors argue for new research to bridge this gap, highlight the essential role of requirements management and broaden understanding to improve benefits realisation, particularly for FED processes.

show abstract

“…Other concerns are discussed in the literature including the impact of project brief clarity on project performance (Vahabi et al, 2020). Additionally, Pegoraro and Paula (2017) identified the critical factors affecting the requirements' identification process, including: the lack of open and effective communication, lack of clarity of the objectives, lack of precision in defining client's requirements, client's inexperience, difficulties in accommodating requirements of all involved stakeholders, among other problems. The study also provided some guidelines for overcoming such problems within design, focusing on information clearness to define objectives.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing Project Value Attributes: A Proposed Process for Value Delivery on Construction Projects

Khalife¹,

Emadi²,

Wilner³

et al. 2022

Proc. 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing efforts are being made by lean researchers and practitioners to improve value delivery in the built environment. However, the preliminary process to identify a substantiated list constituting the interests, desires, requirements, and design essentials of different stakeholders on projects is still vague and unorganized. Establishing the Value Attributes List (VAL) is considered fundamental for delivering value. Thus, to answer the question of how to develop the VAL, a set of guidelines and steps are provided. The process was constructed by performing action research and engaging two case studies depicting two Canadian public projects. This paper also provides a generic list of value attributes to be the starting point for the project team. The list included the major categories to be considered on projects. Findings suggested that developing a customized team-led list is particularly important and pursuing a clear direction on the subsequent steps for monitoring is required. The research concludes that an in-house advocate is needed to (1) promote the process and move it onward, and (2) to make sure the whole team and project stakeholders understand the importance of these value discussions.

show abstract

Requirements processing for building design: a systematic review

Cited by 11 publications

References 43 publications

Using Building Information Modelling to Manage Client Requirements in Social Housing Projects

Using Building Information Modelling to Manage Client Requirements in Social Housing Projects

Front End Projects Benefits Realisation from a Requirements Management Perspective—A Systematic Literature Review

Developing Project Value Attributes: A Proposed Process for Value Delivery on Construction Projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About