Requirements on common solutions to the LSND and MiniBooNE excesses: a post-MicroBooNE study

Abstract

The strong statistical significance of an observed electron-like event excess in the MiniBooNE (MB) experiment, along with an earlier similar excess seen in the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), when interpreted in conjunction with recent MicroBooNE results may have brought us to the cusp of new physics discoveries. This has led to many attempts to understand these observations, both for each experiment individually and in conjunction, via physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). We provide an overview of the current situation, and discuss three major categories under which the many proposals for new physics fall. The possibility that the same new, non-oscillation physics explains both anomalies leads to new restrictions and requirements. An important class of such common solutions, which we focus on in this work, consists of a heavy 𝒪(MeV−sub-GeV) sterile neutral fermion produced in the detectors, (via up-scattering of the incoming muon neutrinos), and subsequently decaying to photons or e+e− pairs which mimic the observed signals. Such solutions are subject to strong demands from a) cross section requirements which would yield a sufficient number of total events in both LSND and MB, b) requirements imposed by the measured energy and angular distributions in both experiments and finally, c) consistency and compatibility of the new physics model and its particle content with other bounds from a diverse swathe of particle physics experiments. We find that these criteria often pull proposed solutions in different directions, and stringently limit the viable set of proposals which could resolve both anomalies. Our conclusions are relevant for both the general search for new physics and for the ongoing observations and analyses of the MicroBooNE experiment.

Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report

“…[1705]). The general idea behind these scenarios is that the new forces mediate neutrino upscattering into N , which can subsequently decay inside neutrino detectors into electromagnetic showers, mimicking the electron-like events observed by MiniBooNE [1706,1707,1708,1709,1710,1711,1712,1713,1577,1576,840,1714,1715,1716,1717,1718,1719,1720,1593,1721,1722]. Below, we will discuss new progress in constraining the models invoked in these explanations using existing accelerator neutrino data.…”

Testing Explanations of Short Baseline Neutrino Anomalies

“…In fact, theoretical activity in low-scale dark sectors has intensified and, unsurprisingly, new darksector solutions to the short-baseline puzzle have been brought to light 160,161,232,233,234,162,135,235,133 and 221,172,222,236,223,237,173,238,239,240,241,242,243,215,177,244 .…”

“…The collimated e + e − pair is then misidentified as a single shower, producing the excess of events at low energy. While several models exploring this mechanism have been studied, only a small subset of those can also explain LSND 244 due to the much harder-to-fake inverse-beta-decay signature. In that case, a neutral mediator in the neutrino-nucleus scattering process should kick out a neutron from inside the Carbon nucleus.…”

“…Models with helicity-flipping interactions and heavy mediators, such as scalar mediator models 244 , have a better chance of describing the angular spectrum. These models also have the advantage of having larger cross sections with neutrons and being attractive in the context of LSND.…”

Probing non-standard neutrino interactions with a light boson from next galactic and diffuse supernova neutrinos

“…A large non-standard neutrino interaction with a light particle can potentially explain short baseline neutrino anomalies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], muon g − 2 anomaly [16][17][18][19][20] and tensions in cosmology [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Relatively smaller neutrino interactions with a new light gauge boson could also help to resolve the Hubble tension [30].…”