2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements for computational rule checking of requests for proposals (RFPs) for building designs in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research efforts are in the area of code compliance checking in the AECO (Architecture Engineering Construction Operation) domain and with the emergence of widely accepted IFC open standards for Building Information Modelling (BIM) data interchange, this has been made possible to resolve (Uhm et al, 2015;C. Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research efforts are in the area of code compliance checking in the AECO (Architecture Engineering Construction Operation) domain and with the emergence of widely accepted IFC open standards for Building Information Modelling (BIM) data interchange, this has been made possible to resolve (Uhm et al, 2015;C. Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, these rules cannot be represented using a humanreadable external format but have to be implemented using a native data format. Another genre of research approaches is focusing on the development of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) system for an automated extraction of the rule knowledge from flow texts of guidelines such as in (Zhang and El-Gohary 2016a), (Zhang and El-Gohary 2016b) or (Uhm et al 2015). However, these approaches are currently limited, since the representation of complex knowledge, such as geometric constraints or operators, is not possible yet.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define circulation evaluation factors, this paper mainly focuses on BIM-enabled circulation related quantities that have been recognized as quantitative and objective grounds for analyzing circulation design [3,5,7,10,11,12,13,16]. The scope of circulation factors is defined referring to previous studies in circulationrelated design aspects from a pedestrian point of view [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].…”
Section: Representation Of Indoor Circulation Factors With Quantity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, qualitative factors such as efficient or accessible route have been excluded practically as a target of the BIM-based design evaluation [4,13]. However, large portion of circulation design requirements described in the RFP or design guidelines (except for building regulatory codes) consist of qualitative factors rather than explicitly-defined ones and those factors influence pedestrian circulation quality from various perspectives [13,15]. As motivated by such fundamentals, precedent research [14] discussed design evaluation approach in the BIM environment focusing on qualitative circulation issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%