Proceedings XXII Congresso Brasileiro De Automática 2018
DOI: 10.20906/cps/cba2018-0644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements Engineering at a Glance: Comparing GORE and UML methods in the design of automated systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, GORE could model requirements at lower levels of abstractions than UML. Silva et al [52] explained that using GORE to model a requirement or concept could be presented with fewer structural diagrams than UML. However, UML is more widely known and used than GORE, also, GORE was reported to be more difficult to learn among non-software engineers [53,54].…”
Section: Modeling Requirements For Human-centered Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, GORE could model requirements at lower levels of abstractions than UML. Silva et al [52] explained that using GORE to model a requirement or concept could be presented with fewer structural diagrams than UML. However, UML is more widely known and used than GORE, also, GORE was reported to be more difficult to learn among non-software engineers [53,54].…”
Section: Modeling Requirements For Human-centered Aimentioning
confidence: 99%