Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements-Driven Design and Configuration Management of Business Processes

Abstract: Abstract. The success of a business process (BP) depends on whether it meets its business goal as well as non-functional requirements associated with it. BP specifications frequently need to accommodate changing business priorities, varying client preferences, etc. However, since business process goals and preferences are rarely captured explicitly in the dominant BP modeling approaches, adapting business processes proves difficult. We propose a systematic requirements-driven approach for BP design and configu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On top of variability in data/control dependencies, we introduced the variability in delegation dependencies. Combining the variability support in data, control and delegation dependencies, we were able to generate high-variability business process models in WS-BPEL [19]. In this work, the interface types of component-connector views in WSDL (Web service definition language) were implemented by Web services and controlled by another Web service.…”
Section: Business Processes Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On top of variability in data/control dependencies, we introduced the variability in delegation dependencies. Combining the variability support in data, control and delegation dependencies, we were able to generate high-variability business process models in WS-BPEL [19]. In this work, the interface types of component-connector views in WSDL (Web service definition language) were implemented by Web services and controlled by another Web service.…”
Section: Business Processes Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the metamodel of annotated high-variability goal models, we developed a model-driven goal modeling tool, OpenOME 6 , which is capable of editing goal models, adding annotations, and generating the design views such as feature models [31] and BPEL processes [19]. A simplified goal model in Figure 1 is represented by the XML document in Figure 5a.…”
Section: Tool Support and Traceabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the tool checks the generated alternatives to detect those including tasks executing in parallel and leading to conflicts. RE-Context expects the analyst to specify the effect of each task on the environment, the parallel and sequence operators on a goal model [21], and the logical relations between contexts. More details on this component can be found in [19].…”
Section: Case Tool: Re-contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business process customization is usually opposed to configuration, which aims at designing reference process models capturing the behavior of a set of process variants serving the same business goal [22][23][24]. We argue that the business process configuration approach does not suit mass-customization, since capturing all possible process variants in a single process model leads to very complex models that are not easily understandable by the process customers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%