Réquiem Para Uma Iniciativa De Regionalismo Sul-Americano: Ideologia vs. Pragmatismo No Ocaso Da Unasul

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the recent dismantling of the Union of South-American Nations (UNASUR) under the governments of the liberal-conservative turn recently experienced in South America. Through the mobilization of excerpts from speeches by Heads of State in the region, it is possible to note that the allegedly “ideological” character of UNASUR is presented as the main justification for leaving the institution. Having that in mind, the main objective of the article is to interrogate narratives about the ‘ideological’ character of UNASUL. For that, the article presents a literature review on regionalism, pragmatism and ideology to challenge this narrative. It is argued, first, that pragmatism and ideology in regionalism are not dichotomous, but complementary concepts. Moreover, despite UNASUR’s ideological elements, the organization represents a series of alignments and pragmatic factors in its institutionalization and performance. Finally, it is argued that the proposals for “de-ideologization” and “pragmatic realignment” of the regionalism of the new rights in South America are, in fact, more ideological than pragmatic as they claim.

The polarization of the south american integration: the Unasur case

“…From the speeches of Heads of States in South America about the reasons to leave Unasur, Guerra and Frisso (2020) argue that despite recognizing the ideological elements of Unasur, as consequence of the influence of the context that it rose, the organization had several pragmatic proposes. On the other hand, the argument of the authors is that the critics of Unasur, symbolized by launching PROSUR, for example, are more ideological than pragmatic as it is given in the speeches.…”