2023
DOI: 10.29333/ejecs/1598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Request Constructions in Classical Arabic versus Modern Arabic: A Corpus-based Study

Nawal Fadhil Abbas,
Tabarek Ali Qasim,
Haya Abdul-Salam Jasim

Abstract: The present study aims to investigate the various request constructions used in Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic language by identifying the differences in their usage in these two different genres. Also, the study attempts to trace the cases of felicitous and infelicitous requests in the Arabic language. Methodologically, the current study employs a web-based corpus tool (Sketch Engine) to analyze different corpora: the first one is Classical Arabic, represented by King Saud University Corpus of Classical A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These request types, according to Bisriyah's study, are response seekers and serve to communicate further pragmatic functions other than requesting. Further, by using data from the Qur'an, Abbas et al (2023) discussed the different request constructions used in Classical and Modern Arabic in an attempt to identify the differences in the two varieties in terms of request usage and the discourse functions communicated by each construction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These request types, according to Bisriyah's study, are response seekers and serve to communicate further pragmatic functions other than requesting. Further, by using data from the Qur'an, Abbas et al (2023) discussed the different request constructions used in Classical and Modern Arabic in an attempt to identify the differences in the two varieties in terms of request usage and the discourse functions communicated by each construction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%