Repulsive long-range forces between anisotropic atoms and dielectrics

Abstract

We investigate long-range forces between atoms with anisotropic electric polarizability interacting with dielectrics having anisotropic permittivity in the weak-coupling approximation. Unstable configurations in which the force between the objects is repulsive are constructed. Such configurations exist for three anisotropic atoms as well as for an anisotropic atom above a dielectric plate with a hole whose permittivity is anisotropic. Apart from the absolute magnitude of the force, the dependence on the configuration is qualitatively the same as for metallic objects for which the anisotropy is a purely geometric effect. In the weak limit closed analytic expressions for rather complicated configurations are obtained. The non-monotonic dependence of the interaction energy on separation is related to the fact that the electromagnetic Green's dyadic is not positive definite. The analysis in the weak limit is found to also semi-quantitatively explain the dependence of Casimir forces on the orientation of anisotropic dielectrics observed experimentally. Contrary to the scalar case, irreducible electromagnetic three-body energies can change sign. We trace this to the fact that the electromagnetic Green's dyadic is not positive definite.Comment: 9 page

Long-Range Repulsion Between Spatially Confined van der Waals Dimers

“…(20). The resulting long-range repulsive energy, similar to the 1D example, is the mean-field energy of an instantaneous quadrupole and varies as R −5 .…”

“…The third term in Eq. (20) is the coupling between X and Y components of the potential. The final expression shows that the leading contribution to the long-range energy…”

“…In fact, reported cases of longrange repulsion between physisorbed molecules abound in recent experimental literature [12][13][14][15][16]. The usual explanation attributes the repulsion to the charge transfer between the Fermi level of the metal surface and the molecular orbitals of the adsorbate [17] or the dominance of Pauli repulsion over a London-type dispersion interaction [18][19][20]. These explanations, however, do not apply to large molecules physisorbed on metallic surfaces.…”

Anisotropic contribution to the van der Waals and the Casimir-Polder energies forCO2andCH4molecules near surfaces and thin films

“…1). We address this by studying the interaction energy of an anisotropically polarizable molecule in front of a dielectric slab of finite thickness which is anisotropic only in the direction perpendicular to the slab [8,9]. We study the contribution from anisotropic polarizabilities to the Casimir-Polder interaction energy of a CO 2 and a CH 4 molecule in front of atomically thin gold films and an amorphous silica slab.…”

Casimir-Polder repulsion: Polarizable atoms, cylinders, spheres, and ellipsoids

“…VI, we will consider perfect conducting boundaries S immersed in vacuum, in which case we need to solve this equation with ε = 1 for Γ subject to the boundary conditionsn × Γ(r, r ′ ) r∈S = 0, wheren is the normal to the surface of the 1 After the first version of this paper was prepared, Ref. [17] appeared, which rederived these results, and then went on to extend the calculation to Casimir-Polder repulsion by an anisotropic dilute dielectric sheet with a circular aperture. The authors quite correctly point out that the statement in Ref.…”