2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REPSA: General combinatorial approach for identifying preferred ligand–DNA binding sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our SlmA structure, showing that it contains a N‐terminal HTH and is a TetR member, suggested that it may bind a palindromic DNA site as a homodimer, in a manner similar to other TetR proteins (Orth et al , 2000; Schumacher et al , 2002). With this a priori assumption, we went on to determine whether SlmA displays DNA‐binding specificity by conducting a restriction endonuclease protection, selection and amplification (REPSA) experiment (Van Dyke et al , 2007). The 43 unique possible binding sequences identified via REPSA were analysed with the sequence motif discovery program, Multiple Expectation Maximum for Motif Elicitation (MEME) (Supplementary Figure S4) (Bailey et al , 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our SlmA structure, showing that it contains a N‐terminal HTH and is a TetR member, suggested that it may bind a palindromic DNA site as a homodimer, in a manner similar to other TetR proteins (Orth et al , 2000; Schumacher et al , 2002). With this a priori assumption, we went on to determine whether SlmA displays DNA‐binding specificity by conducting a restriction endonuclease protection, selection and amplification (REPSA) experiment (Van Dyke et al , 2007). The 43 unique possible binding sequences identified via REPSA were analysed with the sequence motif discovery program, Multiple Expectation Maximum for Motif Elicitation (MEME) (Supplementary Figure S4) (Bailey et al , 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other clones had varying regions of homology to their defined consensus sequence, ranging from three to 10 base pairs. While REPSA and genomic SELEX are related combinatorial selection methods, they have different strengths and weaknesses [17]. In this particular circumstance, genomic SELEX did not provide a substantially greater understanding of TTHA0973-DNA binding specificity than what was obtained through homology studies alone and was far inferior to the extent of data obtained by REPSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These libraries contained ST2R24 selection templates and 73-bp double-stranded deoxyribonucleotides with a central randomized 24-bp core flanked by defined sequences possessing IISRE-binding sites for FokI and BpmI [ 21 ]. Their design permitted the probing of sequence-specific protein-DNA binding through their inhibition of IISRE cleavage within the randomized core and the survival of intact templates for subsequent PCR amplification [ 37 ]. Defined, duplex DNA probes for biolayer interferometry (BLI) analyses were synthesized by PCR using ST2Ls and 5′-biotin-modified IRD7-ST2R primers, as previously described [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%