2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1432-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive seasonality is a poor predictor of receptive synchrony and male reproductive skew among nonhuman primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Should our hypothesis be true, we would expect to find outside takeovers in other primates with high reproductive skew, and many males per group as well. However, such species are probably rare in primates, because the number of males and reproductive skew are usually negatively correlated with each other [Gogarten & Koenig, 2012]. The reason why some species do not follow this pattern is still unclear and merits further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should our hypothesis be true, we would expect to find outside takeovers in other primates with high reproductive skew, and many males per group as well. However, such species are probably rare in primates, because the number of males and reproductive skew are usually negatively correlated with each other [Gogarten & Koenig, 2012]. The reason why some species do not follow this pattern is still unclear and merits further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this prediction, males of primate species with large group sizes exhibit more sexually dimorphic and visually conspicuous secondary sexual ornaments than those living in small groups [35]. However, an increased number of males within breeding groups is also predicted to generate increased risk and intensity of sperm competition, with evolutionary consequences for male expenditure on ejaculates [37][38][39][40][41]. If males face a trade-off between ornamentation and ejaculate expenditure, post-mating sexual selection might constrain the independent evolution of ornamentation among primate species and contribute to the variation in ornamentation seen across the primate phylogeny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recent studies have combined modeling and metaanalysis to better comprehend the factors driving this striking variation (Gogarten and Koenig, 2013;Kutsukake and Nunn, 2009;Ostner et al, 2008b;Port and Kappeler, 2010). Given that mate-guarding has been proven to significantly enhance mating and/or reproductive success in male primates (rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, Berard et al, Hormones and Behavior 66 (2014) [637][638][639][640][641][642][643][644][645][646][647][648] 1994; Bercovitch, 1997, long-tailed macaques, M. fascicularis, de Ruiter et al, 1994Engelhardt et al, 2006; Japanese macaques, M. fuscata, Matsubara, 2003;and mandrills, Mandrillus sphinx, Setchell et al, 2005), this behavior is also likely to be one of the determinants of male reproductive skew.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%