Reproductive seasonality in captive wild ruminants: implications for biogeographical adaptation, photoperiodic control, and life history

Abstract

Many ruminant species show seasonal patterns of reproduction. Causes for this are widely debated, and include adaptations to seasonal availability of resources (with cues either from body condition in more tropical, or from photoperiodism in higher latitude habitats) and/or defence strategies against predators. Conclusions so far are limited to datasets with less than 30 species. Here, we use a dataset on 110 wild ruminant species kept in captivity in temperate-zone zoos to describe their reproductive patterns quantitatively [determining the birth peak breadth (BPB) as the number of days in which 80% of all births occur]; then we link this pattern to various biological characteristics [latitude of origin, mother-young-relationship (hider/follower), proportion of grass in the natural diet (grazer/browser), sexual size dimorphism/mating system], and compare it with reports for free-ranging animals. When comparing taxonomic subgroups, variance in BPB is highly correlated to the minimum, but not the maximum BPB, suggesting that a high BPB (i.e. an aseasonal reproductive pattern) is the plesiomorphic character in ruminants. Globally, latitude of natural origin is highly correlated to the BPB observed in captivity, supporting an overruling impact of photoperiodism on ruminant reproduction. Feeding type has no additional influence; the hider/follower dichotomy, associated with the anti-predator strategy of 'swamping', has additional influence in the subset of African species only. Sexual size dimorphism and mating system are marginally associated with the BPB, potentially indicating a facilitation of polygamy under seasonal conditions. The difference in the calculated Julian date of conception between captive populations and that reported for free-ranging ones corresponds to the one expected if absolute day length was the main trigger in highly seasonal species: calculated day length at the time of conception between free-ranging and captive populations followed a y = x relationship. Only 11 species (all originating from lower latitudes) were considered to change their reproductive pattern distinctively between the wild and captivity, with 10 becoming less seasonal (but not aseasonal) in human care, indicating that seasonality observed in the wild was partly resource-associated. Only one species (Antidorcas marsupialis) became more seasonal in captivity, presumably because resource availability in the wild overrules the innate photoperiodic response. Reproductive seasonality explains additional variance in the body mass-gestation period relationship, with more seasonal species having shorter gestation periods for their body size. We conclude that photoperiodism, and in particular absolute day length, are genetically fixed triggers for reproduction that may be malleable to some extent by body condition, and that plasticity in gestation length is an important facilitator that may partly explain the success of ruminant radiation to high latitudes. Evidence for an anti-predator strategy involving seasonal reproduction is li...

Old World Ruminant Morphophysiology, Life History, and Fossil Record: Exploring Key Innovations of a Diversification Sequence

“…This makes giraffids the only pecoran group that is unable to adopt a seasonal breeding pattern (that would be advantageous in more temperate climates) without losing breeding potential due to longer periods of reproductive inactivity (Zerbe et al 2012). The fact that giraffid diversity was proportionally lower in Eurasia, with a putatively more temperate climate, than in Africa (e.g.…”

“…Reasons why giraffid newborns, which are of a similar degree of precociality as bovid or cervid newborns, require these dramatically longer gestation times for their development are, to our knowledge, unknown. Because short gestation times will reduce generation intervals, and may represent an important adaptation to seasonal environments (Zerbe et al 2012), this difference could put giraffids at a disadvantage, both in terms of geographical range they can exploit competitively, and in niche competition with crown Pecora of shorter generation intervals.…”

“…Additionally, the length of the gestation period is relevant for reproduction in seasonal environments, as it will determine if species can reproduce in synchrony with seasonal variation without losing reproductive potential (Kiltie 1988, Owen-Smith 1988. Modifications of gestation period might therefore be part of a set of adaptations that facilitates the invasion of new, more seasonal, environmental niches (Zerbe et al 2012). Although the length of the gestation period can vary intraspecifically with a variety of factors (reviewed in Clements et al 2011), gestation period is a reliable species-specific measure that allows inter-specific comparisons (Ogutu et al 2010, Clements et al 2011.…”

Influencia de la Melatonina sobre la fisiología y la conducta de ungulados

“…El reposo sexual se describe en todos los ungulados, con un gradiente de estacionalidad cuando la latitud se incrementa o disminuyeen relación a la línea del ecuador. Las especies que se encuentran bajo latitudes medias y altas (30-60°N), concentran los partos en primavera y principios del verano (Zerbe et al, 2012). En las zonas tropicales y subtropicales de latitud baja (<23°N), la estacionalidad tiende a desaparecer y la mayoría de las especies son capaces de reproducirse durante todo el año.…”

Reproductive seasonality in African ungulates in relation to rainfall

“…Offspring of ungulates are born at a nutritionally optimal time for their survival, which is early in the growing season (spring), when food quality is highest to support peak maternal demands extending through late pregnancy and early (pre-weaning) lactation (Gaillard et al 1993;Langvatn et al 2004;Zerbe et al 2012). In high latitudes, the timing is tightly controlled by photoperiod, and the birth season narrowly spans 2-3 weeks (Spinage 1973;Bradshaw and Holzapfel 2007).…”