2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2004.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive outcomes in DDT applicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Toft et al (2005), INUENDO group, showed that fecundability is inversely related with serum concentration of p,p'DDE. Cocco et al (2005) concluded that the fecundity ratio among spouses of DDT applicators compare to the unexposed was decreased, but the low statistical power of the study did not allow definitive conclusions. Cohn et al (2003) measured serum levels of DDT and DDE in mothers and evaluated TTP in their daughters.…”
Section: Pesticide Exposure and Health Related Issues In Male And Femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toft et al (2005), INUENDO group, showed that fecundability is inversely related with serum concentration of p,p'DDE. Cocco et al (2005) concluded that the fecundity ratio among spouses of DDT applicators compare to the unexposed was decreased, but the low statistical power of the study did not allow definitive conclusions. Cohn et al (2003) measured serum levels of DDT and DDE in mothers and evaluated TTP in their daughters.…”
Section: Pesticide Exposure and Health Related Issues In Male And Femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although banned in the 1970s in North America and Europe, they are still used in some countries [1,2]. Occupational exposure has been associated with hormonal and reproductive disruption [3][4][5] as well as immune dysfunctions [6]. Nonoccupational exposure of the general human population has been of increasing concern over the last several decades based on the awareness that many chemicals have been inadequately tested with regard to safety and the increasing sophistication of toxicology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is some evidence from human studies that exposure to POPs, many of which are known endocrine disruptors, may increase the risk of certain cancers, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Colt et al 2005; Engel et al 2007), pancreatic cancer (Hardell et al 2007; Hoppin et al 2000; Porta et al 1999), and prostate cancer (Ritchie et al 2003). In addition, POP exposures have been associated with autoimmune diseases (Powell et al 1999), diabetes, (Longnecker and Daniels 2001), developmental neurotoxicity (Kakeyama and Tohyama 2003; Seegal 1996; Tilson and Kodavanti 1998; Winneke et al 2002), and adverse reproductive end points, such as spontaneous abortion (Korrick et al 2001; Longnecker et al 2005; Venners et al 2005), birth defects (Salazar-Garcia et al 2004), and impaired male fertility (Cocco et al 2005; Pflieger-Bruss et al 2004). However, the mechanisms by which POPs can lead to these diseases and adverse outcomes are not well characterized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%