2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00107-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive management of postpartum cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
144
2
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
144
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…These results would reflect the similar changes in body weight and body condition showed by the groups. It is well known that body condition and body weight are functional indicators of energy status and rebreeding performance after calving (Randel 1990) and that the rate of body condition losses after calving may be more influential on reproductive performance than absolute body condition score at calving (Roche et al 2000). Even though pregnancy rates found in the present experiment seemed to be low, they are consistent with pregnancy rates found at early lactation (90 days postpartum) in DP cows at the same experimental station (Aguilar-Pérez et al 2009a, 2009b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These results would reflect the similar changes in body weight and body condition showed by the groups. It is well known that body condition and body weight are functional indicators of energy status and rebreeding performance after calving (Randel 1990) and that the rate of body condition losses after calving may be more influential on reproductive performance than absolute body condition score at calving (Roche et al 2000). Even though pregnancy rates found in the present experiment seemed to be low, they are consistent with pregnancy rates found at early lactation (90 days postpartum) in DP cows at the same experimental station (Aguilar-Pérez et al 2009a, 2009b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…SR cows were not found to be affected by different milk yield levels, while SH cows in loose-housing system, in accordance with Lopez et al (2004), tended to have a decreasing OI with increasing milk yield levels. Lower CR in SH could be due to stronger selection for milk yield in SH cows and/or a negative energy balance (NEB), which could result in impaired follicle development and ovulation, fewer oestrous symptoms and a delay in the recovery of the uterine tissue, which is often seen in high-producing dairy cows (Butler, 2000;Roche et al, 2000;Rodriguez-Martinez et al, 2008). Swedish Holstein cows tend to prioritize milk yield and go into a faster and deeper NEB than SR cows (Berglund & Danell, 1987;Hjertén, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In acute episodes, chemical mediators (cytokines, interleukins and tumor necrosis factor) and lypopolissacarides released by Gram negative bacteria may lead to reduction in appetite and feed intake (Ingvartsen & Andersen, 2000;Nikolic et al, 2003). In such cases, prolonged CCI would result from a negative energy balance due to the high metabolic burden needed for milk production (Roche et al, 2000;Dobson et al, 2007), which enhances the metabolic demand of many substances, such as estrogens (Butler, 2000;Lopez et al, 2004). So, cows with high daily milk production may present absent or irregular ovarian activity and, thus, less intense estrus expression than those with lower daily milk production (Roche et al, 2000;Lopez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Herdmentioning
confidence: 99%