2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1545907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals: Politics, Ethics, Evidence and an ‘Unholy Alliance’

Abstract: BWPI Working Paper 105Creating and sharing knowledge to help end poverty 1 University of Manchester David.hulme@manchester.ac.uk Brooks World Poverty Institute ISBN : 978-1-907247-04-0 www.manchester.ac.uk/bwpi AbstractThis paper provides a chronological account of the evolution of the concept and policy of reproductive health and its initial entry, and subsequent exclusion, from UN declarations. In the 1990s effective lobbying by sexual and reproductive rights activists established reproductive health for all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some governments champion the issue, conservative governments resist the agenda -many viewing gender equality to be a Western imposition and/or a threat to their cultures -prompting global health organisations to act cautiously for fear of offending key constituents (I8, I13) [47]. For instance, in the early 2000s a number of Islamic states and the United States under the George W. Bush administration blocked inclusion of reproductive health in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) [48]. Most recently, proponents fear that the international wave of populist politics will inhibit global health organisations (I1, I13, I14, I15, I16, I19), one commenting that (I15), "politics is throwing up more and more rightwing misogynist leadership.…”
Section: Political Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some governments champion the issue, conservative governments resist the agenda -many viewing gender equality to be a Western imposition and/or a threat to their cultures -prompting global health organisations to act cautiously for fear of offending key constituents (I8, I13) [47]. For instance, in the early 2000s a number of Islamic states and the United States under the George W. Bush administration blocked inclusion of reproductive health in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) [48]. Most recently, proponents fear that the international wave of populist politics will inhibit global health organisations (I1, I13, I14, I15, I16, I19), one commenting that (I15), "politics is throwing up more and more rightwing misogynist leadership.…”
Section: Political Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1996, the OECD's Development Assistance Committee launched a document entitled "Shaping the 21st Century," which outlined seven global International Development Goals (IDGs) adapted from the recent flurry of UN conferences, and included a goal on reproductive health as "access through the primary health-care system to reproductive health services for all individuals of appropriate ages as soon as possible and no later than the year 2015" (DAC 1996;Hulme 2009b). The MDGs drew heavily from the themes of the IDGs.…”
Section: Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the Millennium Declaration was approved, specific targets and indicators were established in a Road Map document to monitor progress on the broad aspirations set out in the Declaration. In the resulting MDGs, there were only two significant deviations from the IDGs: first, MDG 8 was added to develop a "global partnership for development"; and second, the IDG reproductive health goal, separate from the goal on maternal health, disappeared (DAC 1996;UN 2001;Hulme 2009b).…”
Section: The Millennium Declaration and Mdgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While reproductive health was promoted in the international development goals, 10 for complex reasons there was no effective push for sexual and reproductive health and rights during the development of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and they were not included. 11 There were also other glaring omissions, such as no employment goals or targets. So MDG target 1B " Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people" had to be added following the progress review in 2005 at the same time as target 5B "Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health".…”
Section: Reviewing Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%