1988
DOI: 10.2307/1521002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Effects of Nest-Marking Studies in an American White Pelican Colony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased regurgitation and agitation of pelicans has been attributed to the presence of humans (Johnson and Sloan 1976;Boellstorff et al 1988;Johnsgard 1993). The resulting increased distress may have decreased feed intake compared to wild (unconfined) pelicans (Uramoto 1961;Kale 1965;Willson and Harmenson 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased regurgitation and agitation of pelicans has been attributed to the presence of humans (Johnson and Sloan 1976;Boellstorff et al 1988;Johnsgard 1993). The resulting increased distress may have decreased feed intake compared to wild (unconfined) pelicans (Uramoto 1961;Kale 1965;Willson and Harmenson 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither were there signs of large scale interference by human activity like destruction of nests or egg collection. Several authors (Anderson & Keith, 1980;Fetterolf, 1983;Anderson, 1988;Boellstorff et al, 1988) have shown that research may cause serious effects on the breeding results of birds. During our research the frequency and duration of the visits were comparable in all colonies.…”
Section: Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger problem may arise because various studies used different methodologies to monitor nests. Also, in some cases, fledging success was determined after nest and egg marking; this may have a detrimental effect on survivorship of young (Boellestorff et al 1988). …”
Section: Overall Breeding Successmentioning
confidence: 99%