2004
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.7.1052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive ecology of distylous Palicourea Padifolia (Rubiaceae) in a tropical montane cloud forest. I. Hummingbirds' effectiveness as pollen vectors

Abstract: The adaptiveness of distyly has been typically investigated in terms of its female function, specifically pollen receipt. However, pollen loads on stigmas can only provide moderate support for Darwin's hypothesis of the promotion of legitimate crosses. To determine the effectiveness of hummingbirds as pollen vectors between floral morphs and the consequences in terms of male (pollen transfer) and female function (pollen receipt) in Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae), floral visitors, their foraging modes, and te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
88
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(108 reference statements)
5
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using artificial flowers, this study concluded that these morphs are able to promote disassortative pollination themselves without any need for reciprocal stigma-anther positioning. Less attention has been paid to the pollinators responsible for such patterns, notwithstanding the fact that the pollination efficiency of floral visitors may vary in terms of the floral morph (Ornduff 1975c;Ornelas et al 2004;Adler & Irwin 2006;Schlindwein & Medeiros 2006;Taki et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using artificial flowers, this study concluded that these morphs are able to promote disassortative pollination themselves without any need for reciprocal stigma-anther positioning. Less attention has been paid to the pollinators responsible for such patterns, notwithstanding the fact that the pollination efficiency of floral visitors may vary in terms of the floral morph (Ornduff 1975c;Ornelas et al 2004;Adler & Irwin 2006;Schlindwein & Medeiros 2006;Taki et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C.M. Taylor & Lorence resulted in signifi cant difference in fruit production between fl oral morphs, independent of the pollination treatment and pollinator species (hummingbirds); S-morph fl owers developed proportionally almost twice as many fruits as L-morph fl owers (Ornelas et al 2004a). On the other hand, González et al (2005) observed a similar fruit production in P. padifolia morphs, in fi ve years of evaluation at the same study site as Ornelas et al (2004a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…the number of infl orescences and open fl owers) of each morph, which contribute to attract fl oral visitors (Ornelas et al 2004b). The fl oral dimorphism, i.e., differences in the length of the corolla, style, stigma and stamen and in the pollen sizes between the morphs, common in distylous species, is another factor that may infl uence the reproductive success of the morphs (Lloyd 1979, Ornelas et al 2004a, González et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among heterostylous species that lack a heteromorphic incompatibility system, morphological differences between morphs particularly exert a strong influence over breeding patterns between individuals (Barrett et al 2004). In heterostylous species, reciprocal herkogamy is expected to promote intermorph pollination through deposition of pollen from different morphs in separate parts of the pollinators' body (Lloyd & Webb 1992;Ornelas et al 2004;Massinga et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%