1970
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/63.2.466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Biology of Sarcophaga tibialis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). I. Life History with Notes on Prepupation Mortality and Pupation Habits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, several factors should be considered to determine the validity of the infestation: identification of the larva and instar stage, dates of reported collection and presentation to the health care provider, condition of specimen, and clinical manifestations. Contamination of stools is relatively easy, and with some flies (i.e., Sarcophaga), first-instar larvae are deposited by the female, and development is rapid (101). As such, it can appear that the larvae were already present in the stool.…”
Section: Urinary and Intestinal Myiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, several factors should be considered to determine the validity of the infestation: identification of the larva and instar stage, dates of reported collection and presentation to the health care provider, condition of specimen, and clinical manifestations. Contamination of stools is relatively easy, and with some flies (i.e., Sarcophaga), first-instar larvae are deposited by the female, and development is rapid (101). As such, it can appear that the larvae were already present in the stool.…”
Section: Urinary and Intestinal Myiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like most Sarcophagidae, S. tibialis is larviparous [ 16 ], with eggs usually hatching inside the uterus. Eggs laid in groups or together with larvae have been reported not to hatch [ 17 ]. As in most flies, the rate of development is largely temperature-dependent [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General species distribution was derived mostly from Pape (1996); Pape et al (2015); Povolný and Verves (1997); Verves and Khrokalo (2006a, b, 2009, 2015); Verves et al (2015b); Xue et al (2011, 2015). Additional sources were as follows: Pape et al (2002), Abasa (1970); Abd-AlGalil and Zambare (2016); Abdul-Rassoul et al (2004); Al-Ghzawi et al (2009); Al-Mesbah et al (2012); Aldrich (1916); Amoudi (1993); Arnaud (1975); Arthur and Coppel (1953); Baranov (1929, 1938, 1942); Barnett and Emms (1998); Beaver (1986); Bezzi (1913, 1915, 1921); Blackith et al (1997); Boscarelli and Sandri 2016); Brèthes (1908); Brimley (1938); Brink (2009); Britton (1921); Britvec (2000); Bruce and Knipling (1936); Bryan (1926); Buckell and Spencer (1945); Byers (1962); Calero (1948); Carles-Tolrá and Rosado 2009); Chaiwong et al (2009); Clausen (1978); Cockerell (1905); Coe (1960, 1962); Criddle (1927); Curran (1929); Davis (1971); Dear (1980); Demyanova et al (2007); Diaz and Kaufman (2011); Disney (1973); El-Hawagry et al (2016); Feng et al (2012); Fetene and Worku (2009); Frost et al (2010); Gatt and Ebejer (2014)); Goff (1991); Goff and Odom (1987); Grabovac and Pertič (2005); Grigorian (1988); Hardy (1980); Ho (1938); Hutson (1981); James (1947); Johnson (1912); Kano et al (1999); Kehlmaier (1998); Khan and Khan (1984); Krishnamurti and Usman (1955); Krüger et al (2003); Kurahashi and Chaiwong (2013); Kurahashi and Ka...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%