2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0465-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in western France: does staining improve estimation of litter size from placental scar counts?

Abstract: We tested a staining method on uteri for counting placental scars on red fox. We estimated reproduction parameters on 358 females collected in three study areas in western France from 1st February 2002 to 31st January 2005. Placental scars (n=103) were described by macroscopic examinations using the following variables: (1) the width and (2) the aspect of placental scars, (3) the abundance of macrophages or the presence of blood, (4) the presence of swellings, (5) the presence and colour of a central band and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of the studied population was estimated at 1.00 adults/km 2 (0.87–1.16) and 0.57 adults/km 2 (0.45–0.71) for the pre‐mange and mange periods, respectively. Although higher densities have been reported for an urban fox population in Bristol (7.8–25.8 adults/km 2 for the pre‐mange period and 0.7–37.0 adults/km 2 for the mange period; Soulsbury et al ), the current estimates agree with other reports of 0.46–1.04 adults/km 2 in Germany (Stubbe ), 0.57–2.76 adults/km 2 in Britain (Heydon et al ), 0.21–2.23 adults/km 2 in Britain (Webbon et al ), 0.9–2.2 adults/km 2 in France (Ruette and Albaret ), and 0.01–2.8 adults/km 2 around the latitude of 45°N in Eurasia (Bartoń and Zalewski ). Therefore, we consider that our analyses yielded reliable estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density of the studied population was estimated at 1.00 adults/km 2 (0.87–1.16) and 0.57 adults/km 2 (0.45–0.71) for the pre‐mange and mange periods, respectively. Although higher densities have been reported for an urban fox population in Bristol (7.8–25.8 adults/km 2 for the pre‐mange period and 0.7–37.0 adults/km 2 for the mange period; Soulsbury et al ), the current estimates agree with other reports of 0.46–1.04 adults/km 2 in Germany (Stubbe ), 0.57–2.76 adults/km 2 in Britain (Heydon et al ), 0.21–2.23 adults/km 2 in Britain (Webbon et al ), 0.9–2.2 adults/km 2 in France (Ruette and Albaret ), and 0.01–2.8 adults/km 2 around the latitude of 45°N in Eurasia (Bartoń and Zalewski ). Therefore, we consider that our analyses yielded reliable estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The average (95% credible interval) of estimated population size in the Nemuro Peninsula was 340.3 (298.8-392.2) for the pre-mange period and 197.6 (148.2-255.4) for the mange period. The mating system of the red fox is basically monogamous (Iossa et al 2008), the average litter size is estimated at around 5 (Stubbe 1980, Harris 1981, Ruette and Albaret 2011, and the mean of observed numbers of cubs at den sites in this study was Table 1. Partial regression coefficient estimates (PRC), standard deviation (SD), and other statistical values of explanatory variables in the generalized linear model for natural mortality [natural morality (year t) $ adult numbers (t) þ culling mortality (t À 1) þ birth rate (t) þ mange (t)] and birth rate [birth rate (t) $ adult numbers (t) þ culling mortality (t À 1) þ natural morality (t À 1) þ mange (t)].…”
Section: Population Estimationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Uteri horns were opened longitudinally and examined for placental scars (Elmeros et al, 2003;Lindström, 1994). When the evaluation of litter size was questionable, we used a staining method to facilitate the identification of active placental scars (Ruette and Albaret, 2011).…”
Section: Reproductive Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a singular aspect when compared to others from the same uterus or from other uteri at the same period of examination. However it does not permit the distinction of scars that could have persisted from earlier pregnancies from those that have been due to resorption or abortion (Ruette et Albaret, 2011). So, we did not estimate resorption rates from atypical placental scars counts.…”
Section: Reproductive Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation