2016
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.14715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction of the Atlantic Forest endemic star-throated antwren, Rhopias gularis (Aves: Thamnophilidae)

Abstract: The Thamnophilidae are one of the most speciose Neotropical bird families, yet aspects of their natural history remain poorly documented. Here we provide information on breeding phenology, the length of incubation and nestling periods, parental care, and nesting success of the Star-throated Antwren, Rhopias gularis, an Atlantic Forest endemic. The data are discussed in light of life history theories. We found 27 active nests during two breeding seasons (2013/2014 and 2014/2015) at Carlos Botelho State Park i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antbird in skin, bill, and rictal flange coloration, including the noticeably whitish feet. Biparental sharing of the duties incubation and nestling attendance is pervasive among the typical antbirds (Skutch 1969, Greenberg and Gradwohl 1983, Zimmer and Isler 2003, although it has been properly quantified only a few times (Perrella et al 2017). During our observations we confirmed biparental attendance in the Squamate Antbird for both incubation and brooding, a behavior also observed in M. loricatus and M. ruficauda (Buzzetti andBarnett 2003, Studer et al 2017).…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antbird in skin, bill, and rictal flange coloration, including the noticeably whitish feet. Biparental sharing of the duties incubation and nestling attendance is pervasive among the typical antbirds (Skutch 1969, Greenberg and Gradwohl 1983, Zimmer and Isler 2003, although it has been properly quantified only a few times (Perrella et al 2017). During our observations we confirmed biparental attendance in the Squamate Antbird for both incubation and brooding, a behavior also observed in M. loricatus and M. ruficauda (Buzzetti andBarnett 2003, Studer et al 2017).…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Clutch sizes consisted of two eggs in the previous nests reported for the Squamate Antbird (Von Ihering 1900, Nehrkorn 1910, Schönwetter and Meise 1967, and also in all of the nests reported for the other Myrmoderus: M. ferrugineus (n = 1 nest), M. ruficauda (n = 42 nests), and M. loricata (n = 1 nest) (Stratford 2000, Buzzetti and Barnett 2003, Studer et al 2017, matching the general pattern found for tropical forest passerines (Jetz et al 2008), including other Thamnophilidae found at similar latitudes (Roper 2005, Perrella et al 2017. The clutch of a single egg found for one of our nests should be viewed with caution, as we were unable to confirm if only one egg was laid or if it could have resulted from a partial nest predation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…During the reproductive activity, it was observed that both the female and the male participated in the incubation of the eggs (Fig. 2), and fed the nestling, like observed in other Thamnophilidae, such as C. melanaria ( Pinho et al 2006), H. maculicauda (Pinho et al 2006), T. pelzelni (Silva & Carmo 2015) and R. gularis (Perrella et al 2017). This is the first study to present information about the reproductive biology of the Silvery-flank Antwren M. luctuosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The young fledged with 11 days, but it could have occurred early due to the manipulation to obtain its measurements. Other species of Thamnophilidae showed similar nestling periods, such as C. melanaria (10 days; Pinho et al 2006), H. maculicauda (11 days;Evangelista 2008), Rhopias gularis (11 days;Perrella et al 2017) and Taraba major (13 days; Lara et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, in this scenario, sexual dimorphism likely resulted from a form of social selection (West-Eberhard 1983, 2014Lyon and Montgomerie 2012) that acts on recognition during parental care of males by females, and vice versa, and by natural selection posing sex-specific pressures during parental care (Martin and Badyaev 1996;Owens and Hartley 1998). This idea is supported by assorted data on breeding biology suggesting that differential parental care is prevalent in sexually dichromatic antbird species, such as Formicivora acutirostris (Reinert 2008), Myrmotherula axillaris (Skutch 1969), Taraba major (Sheldon and Greeney 2008;Skutch 1969), Microrhopias quixensis (Greenberg and Gradwohl 1983;Skutch 1969), Gymnocichla nudiceps (Bradley 2008;Skutch 1969), Hylophylax naevioides, Poliocrania exsul (Rompré and Robinson 2008;Skutch 1969), Thamnophilus caerulescens (Oniki and Willis 1999), and Hafferia zeledoni (Caicedo and Londoño 2017), whereas it is absent in the sexually monochromatic Rhopias gularis (Perrella et al 2017). Regarding vocal communication, there is evidence of social selection in the genus Hypocnemis by the use of songs and calls in both sexes to defend territory annually and maintaining pairs together (Tobias et al 2011).…”
Section: Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%