2013
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2013.851067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction and citizenship/reproducing citizens: editorial introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that successive Korean governments, developing policies within a social investment framework, have actively sought female marriage migrants to perform those roles and have supported them to do so. In this way, we suggest, marriage migrants’ social reproductive role can be understood as vital to the reproduction of the nation, just as feminist scholars have argued that the care work of “citizen‐mothers” can be understood (Roseneil et al., ; Yuval‐Davis and Anthias (Eds), ; Yuval‐Davis, ;). Analysed from this perspective, marriage migrants’ procreation and care for children as a new generation of future citizens serves to legitimize their comparatively privileged position as migrants within Korea's political and social citizenship regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We argue that successive Korean governments, developing policies within a social investment framework, have actively sought female marriage migrants to perform those roles and have supported them to do so. In this way, we suggest, marriage migrants’ social reproductive role can be understood as vital to the reproduction of the nation, just as feminist scholars have argued that the care work of “citizen‐mothers” can be understood (Roseneil et al., ; Yuval‐Davis and Anthias (Eds), ; Yuval‐Davis, ;). Analysed from this perspective, marriage migrants’ procreation and care for children as a new generation of future citizens serves to legitimize their comparatively privileged position as migrants within Korea's political and social citizenship regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Migrant women's work of inscription illuminates a crucial dynamic that “membership of, and belonging to, states, nations, societies and, thus of ‘citizenship itself’” begins with the “technological realties of natality” (Roseneil et al. , 901), instead of a shared common heritage. Their aspiration to produce and preserve proof of their children's birth speaks urgently to the real need for “conceiving the new world order” (Ginsburg and Rapp ) that can preempt the creation of stateless children.…”
Section: Conclusion: Inscribing and Anchoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on exclusion works against elements of this commitment. Through interlocutors with security and border studies (Muller 2004;Nyers 2009; also see Guillaume and Huysmans 2013), critical approaches to migration (Mezzadra and Neilson 2013;Papadopoulos, Stephenson, and Tsianos 2008) as well as (post)colonial (Rigo 2005), gender and queer theory (Roseneil et al 2013), there is now a relatively large body of work exploring citizenship as an inherently exclusive mode of political subjectivity (Hindess 2004). Through both legalistic and normative definitions, the case is presented that the citizen has been scripted as a liberal, white, bourgeois, heterosexual, man and this inherently leads to the powerful hierachisation and securitisation of others (Basham and Vaughan-Williams 2013).…”
Section: Practices Of Citizenship Following Mcnevin We Can Thus Reamentioning
confidence: 99%