2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00041-012-9255-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducing Subgroups of $Sp(2,\mathbb{R})$ . Part I: Algebraic Classification

Abstract: Abstract. We classify the connected Lie subgroups of the symplectic group Sp(2, R) whose elements are matrices in block lower triangular form. The classification is up to conjugation within Sp(2, R). Their study is motivated by the need of a unified approach to continuous 2D signal analyses, as those provided by wavelets and shearlets.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further (partial) classification results exist for abelian irreducibly admissible groups in arbitrary dimensions [18], and for the class of generalized shearlet dilation groups [25] . In a similar spirit to our paper, the papers [1,2] classified a class of subgroups of the metaplectic group that allow an inversion formula under the metaplectic representation. We are not aware of further sources dealing with the systematical construction and classification of irreducibly admissible matrix groups or certain subclasses thereof.…”
Section: Aims and Main Results Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further (partial) classification results exist for abelian irreducibly admissible groups in arbitrary dimensions [18], and for the class of generalized shearlet dilation groups [25] . In a similar spirit to our paper, the papers [1,2] classified a class of subgroups of the metaplectic group that allow an inversion formula under the metaplectic representation. We are not aware of further sources dealing with the systematical construction and classification of irreducibly admissible matrix groups or certain subclasses thereof.…”
Section: Aims and Main Results Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Using the structure of the Lie algebra, with straightforward calculations, we check that the span of the set {w, π(X)w, π(X) 2 w} is invariant under the action of π(h). Appealing to the irreducibility of π the elements w, π(X)w, 1 2 π(X) 2 w form a basis for the vector space V. With respect to this basis, we obtain Let h be the linear span of the matrices above. We shall show that this algebra is isomorphic to so(2, 1) ⊕ R where Indeed, with straightforward computations, we verify that…”
Section: The Non-solvable Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; ii) the "restriction" of the mock-metaplectic representation π to the fiber Φ −1 (1) and to the stability subgroup SO(d) is precisely ρ. Hence, (3.7) provides the decomposition of ρ into its irreducibles, all of them with multiplicity 1; iii) up to the normalization factor 1/ √ 2, the operator SF −1 coincides with the operator introduced in [3], whose main feature is that it decomposes π into its irreducibles, each of which is the canonical representation obtained by inducing the irreducible representation of R × SO(d) acting on H i as…”
Section: The Main Results In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main feature of this example is that once the admissibility conditions are worked out, it is relatively easy to exhibit kernels in Ş pPI L p pGq but hard to find a kernel in L 1 pGq. This example has shown up in the classification of reproducing triangular subgroups of Spp2, Rq, which was recently achieved in [38,18].…”
Section: Shannon Waveletmentioning
confidence: 90%