Reproducing (and Disrupting) Heteronormativity: Gendered Sexual Socialization in Preschool Classrooms

Abstract

Using ethnographic data from 10 months of observations in nine preschool classrooms, I examine gendered sexual socialization children receive from teachers’ practices and reproduce through peer interactions. I find heteronormativity permeates preschool classrooms, where teachers construct (and occasionally disrupt) gendered sexuality in a number of different ways, and children reproduce (and sometimes resist) these identities and norms in their daily play. Teachers use what I call facilitative, restrictive, disruptive, and passive approaches to sexual socialization in preschool classrooms. Teachers’ approaches to gendered sexual socialization varied across preschools observed and affected teachers’ response to children’s behaviors, such as heterosexual romantic play (kissing and relationships), bodily displays, and consent. Additionally, my data suggest young children are learning in preschool that boys have gendered power over girls’ bodies. I find that before children have salient sexual identities of their own, children are beginning to make sense of heteronormativity and rules associated with sexuality through interactions with their teachers and peers in preschool.

Brilliant or Bad: The Gendered Social Construction of Exceptionalism in Early Adolescence

“…Furthermore, the formal age separation, large number of students, and risk of heterosexual teasing can encourage students to separate into gendered friendship groups in settings such as lunch and recess (Thorne 1993). When interacting with their friends, boys often control larger amounts of space, more frequently invade girls' games and activities, and tease or sexually objectify girls (Gansen 2017;Martin 1998;Khan 2011;Pascoe 2007;Thorne 1993). Because educators often leave boys' behavior largely unaddressed (Khan 2011;Pascoe 2007;Thorne 1993), students' patterns of interactions play an important role in legitimizing beliefs that boys are inherently stronger, louder, and more authoritative than girls.…”

Equipping early childhood educators to support the development of sexuality in childhood: Identification of pre- and post-service training needs

“…Educators may struggle with self-shame and personal discomfort around discussing topics involving sexuality, particularly with children (Bhana, 2007). Thus, educators require more training to challenge their own biases in order to create safer environments for all children, specifically those who are developing identities outside of heteronormative and cisnormative frameworks (Davies & skelton, 2017;Davies, Vipond, & King, 2017;Gansen, 2017). Sexuality, as a cultural and social construct, affects what children learn and the norms with which they engage.…”

A Sociological Critique of Youth Strategies and Educational Policies that Address LGBTQ Youth Issues

“…As the research is associated with a broader body of work concerned with "thinking through the effects" of research (Youdell 2009, p. 38), the analysis is circumscribed by a consideration of those documents that incorporate LGBTQ mental health research that was conducted in an Irish context over the last decade. Informed by a Foucauldian consideration of how a particular set of ideas attain the status of truth in a given time and place-in other words, how these ideas circulate and come to operate as "regimes of truth" (Foucault 1990)-the analysis was concerned with how key findings from these studies have informed policy-making, youth strategising and educational practice and specifically what LGBTQ subject positions they render visible, intelligible and legitimate (Youdell 2009).…”