2003 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2003. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/dsn.2003.1209957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducible dependability benchmarking experiments based on unambiguous benchmark setup descriptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DBench was a major project on dependability benchmarking. Several dependability benchmarks were defined in the context of the DBench project, targeting the following application domains: generalpurpose operating systems [12][13], real time kernels and control applications [17], on-line transaction processing systems [23] [5], and web-servers [8]. Other works on dependability benchmarking were carried on afterwards, but DBench did settle the foundations for many other initiatives (see [14] for an overview on dependability benchmarking initiatives).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBench was a major project on dependability benchmarking. Several dependability benchmarks were defined in the context of the DBench project, targeting the following application domains: generalpurpose operating systems [12][13], real time kernels and control applications [17], on-line transaction processing systems [23] [5], and web-servers [8]. Other works on dependability benchmarking were carried on afterwards, but DBench did settle the foundations for many other initiatives (see [14] for an overview on dependability benchmarking initiatives).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prototype we have developed uses a TPC-C client [14] as a privileged workload to be in conformance with the experiments performed on transactional systems in DBench [15,16]. We simply use the TPC-C client as a workload, but we do not use the performance measures specified by TPC-C as they are far from being suitable to characterize the behavior of an OS.…”
Section: Benchmark Execution Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In over 10 percent, the database failed completely, in a few cases database errors were logged. In extremely few cases the database faulttolerance mechanisms detected and correctly recovered from the error [1].…”
Section: Example Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 97%