2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/sfnmk
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducible between-person brain-behavior associations do not always require thousands of individuals

Abstract: Marek et al. analyzed three very large magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets and concluded that thousands of participants are necessary to ensure replicable results in “brain-wide associations studies,” which they defined as “studies of the associations between common inter-individual variability in human brain structure/function and cognition or psychiatric symptomatology.” This conclusion overgeneralizes the implications of their findings and is likely to have an unwarranted chilling effect on neuroimagi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the sample allowed for sufficient power to identify medium effect sizes when conducting correlation analyses at alpha levels of 0.01 and when comparing correlations at alpha levels of 0.05 ( Cohen, 1992 ). Samples of over 200 participants have also been suggested as sufficient for correlational neuroimaging research similar to that performed here ( Cecchetti and Handjaras, 2022 ; DeYoung et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the sample allowed for sufficient power to identify medium effect sizes when conducting correlation analyses at alpha levels of 0.01 and when comparing correlations at alpha levels of 0.05 ( Cohen, 1992 ). Samples of over 200 participants have also been suggested as sufficient for correlational neuroimaging research similar to that performed here ( Cecchetti and Handjaras, 2022 ; DeYoung et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our analyses were also performed using weighted means from each of the three white matter tracts of interest rather than voxel-wise across the whole brain, reducing the potential for false positives ( Marek et al, 2022 ). We also tested a sample of over 200 participants, which has been suggested as sufficient for correlational neuroimaging research such as that performed here ( Cecchetti and Handjaras, 2022 ; DeYoung et al, 2022 ). Relationships with autobiographical memory recall ability were also specific to the MR g-ratio, and were not evident for any of its components (magnetisation transfer saturation, neurite density or isotropic volume fraction), suggesting that it is the combination of these measures, in the form of the MR g-ratio, that is meaningful rather than any single measure alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the sample allowed for sufficient power to identify medium effect sizes when conducting correlation analyses at alpha levels of 0.01 and when comparing correlations at alpha levels of 0.05 (Cohen, 1992). Samples of over 200 participants have also been suggested as sufficient for correlational neuroimaging research similar to that performed here (Cecchetti and Handjaras, pre print; DeYoung et al, pre print).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our analyses were also performed using weighted means from each of the three white matter tracts of interest rather than voxel-wise across the whole brain, reducing the potential for false positives (Marek et al, 2022). We also tested a sample of over 200 participants, which has been suggested as sufficient for correlational neuroimaging research such as that performed here (Cecchetti and Handjaras, pre print; DeYoung et al, pre print).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, leveraging machine learning advances including multivariate models, functional alignment, or individual-specific functional atlases as opposed to group-average atlases is one approach to improving prediction 12,15,54,55,34,35,56 . Our study demonstrates the power of hyperalignment as a tool for understanding developing individual differences in brain and behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%