“…Two conflicting reviews that address it from the point of view of reproducability are present in Florian 2007 andDocampo 2013. 58 Lecuyer 2006. for its historical significance at least Princeton, known for having been host to We also looked at geographical distribution and movements in the next section based on this.…”
Section: Educational Origins Of Turing Winnersmentioning
The Turing Award, commonly described as computer science's highest award and equivalent of the Nobel prize in that discipline, has now been awarded for half a century. In the following, we describe the social regularities that underlie and the conditions that embed these high achievements in computer science innovation. We find, contrary to a meritocratic ideal of one's only abilities determining success or recognition within sciences, that several characteristics of scientists, exogenous and non-exogenous alike to their scientific work and identities, are of overbearing or disproportionate importance in defining academic acknowledgement. We find in particular that nationality or birth place, gender and one's network have a big role in making Turing Award laureates. As do social origins, with a significant portion of Turing Award winners coming primarily from middle- and upper-class family backgrounds, especially households with significant cultural capital i.e. one or both parents hold an advanced degree or are engaged in an academic profession). Reviewing the data before us, we were also unable to ignore the non-participation of visible minorities and non-white computer scientists to the body of Turing Award recipients. In short, place of birth, nationality, gender, social background, "race" and networks play a role in making Turing Award laureates. This paper also explores the ways in which a social history or sociology of computer science and the wider technology sector may unfold in the future, by discussing theoretical implications, methods and sources.
“…Two conflicting reviews that address it from the point of view of reproducability are present in Florian 2007 andDocampo 2013. 58 Lecuyer 2006. for its historical significance at least Princeton, known for having been host to We also looked at geographical distribution and movements in the next section based on this.…”
Section: Educational Origins Of Turing Winnersmentioning
The Turing Award, commonly described as computer science's highest award and equivalent of the Nobel prize in that discipline, has now been awarded for half a century. In the following, we describe the social regularities that underlie and the conditions that embed these high achievements in computer science innovation. We find, contrary to a meritocratic ideal of one's only abilities determining success or recognition within sciences, that several characteristics of scientists, exogenous and non-exogenous alike to their scientific work and identities, are of overbearing or disproportionate importance in defining academic acknowledgement. We find in particular that nationality or birth place, gender and one's network have a big role in making Turing Award laureates. As do social origins, with a significant portion of Turing Award winners coming primarily from middle- and upper-class family backgrounds, especially households with significant cultural capital i.e. one or both parents hold an advanced degree or are engaged in an academic profession). Reviewing the data before us, we were also unable to ignore the non-participation of visible minorities and non-white computer scientists to the body of Turing Award recipients. In short, place of birth, nationality, gender, social background, "race" and networks play a role in making Turing Award laureates. This paper also explores the ways in which a social history or sociology of computer science and the wider technology sector may unfold in the future, by discussing theoretical implications, methods and sources.
“…La metodología ha sido expuesta por sus autores (Liu y Cheng, 2005), aunque durante años han persistido dificultades insalvables en su interpretación con el fin de replicar los resultados de ARWU. Ese objetivo se ha conseguido finalmente con la publicación de Docampo (2013).…”
Section: Academic Ranking Of Word Universities (Arwu)unclassified
“…De acuerdo con la metodología desarrollada por Docampo (2013), se han reproducido los resultados de ARWU para un total de 3500 universidades ente 2008 y 2015, lo que permite obtener no solamente las puntuaciones de las universidades españolas en ARWU, sino también sus posiciones en el mundo en el período que estamos analizando. Los már-genes de error de dos de los indicadores (PUB y N&S, en los demás no se comete ningún error en las aproximaciones), debido sobre todo a la identificación precisa de las instituciones en los motores de búsqueda de la Web of Knowledge, se mantienen por debajo del 3%, por lo que inducen un error en la puntuación final del orden del 1%, lo que permite realizar adecuadamente las comparaciones.…”
Section: Obtención De Indicadoresunclassified
“…Gracias a la aportación de uno de los autores (Docampo, 2013) se ha desarrollado una completa metodología que permite estimar con un elevado nivel de precisión los resultados de ARWU en cualquiera de sus ediciones desde 2003 hasta 2015. Utilizando dicha metodología podemos obtener las puntuaciones de 3500 instituciones de educación superior a nivel global: prácticamente todas las universidades con una producción científica anual de al menos 100 contribuciones indexadas.…”
Resumen: En 2009 nace la iniciativa Campus de Excelencia Internacional (CEI) entre cuyos objetivos estaba mejorar la posición de las universidades españolas en los rankings internacionales con un horizonte de 2015. Este trabajo analiza el impacto de los CEI en la clasificación ARWU o ranking de Shanghái. Comparando la media de los tres años del inicio (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012) y del final (2013)(2014)(2015), el sistema universitario español ha mejorado sensiblemente su prestación investigadora a juzgar por el incremento en puntuación media y en posiciones. Las universidades coordinadoras de proyectos CEI presentan una evolución más estable (aumento del 9%) que las no coordinadoras (aumento del 21%) resultando un sistema universitario más homogéneo. Las universidades con proyectos CEI con una sola universidad alcanzan mejores posiciones. A pesar del contexto de crisis, escaso tiempo y financiación de la iniciativa CEI, la experiencia ha resultado positiva a la vista de la evolución de las universidades españolas en dicho ranking.Palabras clave: Campus de Excelencia Internacional; sistema universitario español; indicadores; clasificaciones internacionales; ARWU; ranking de Shanghái.
Influence of the Campus of International Excellence initiative on the position of Spanish universities in Shanghai's academic rankingAbstract: The Campus of International Excellence (CIE) initiative was launched in Spain in 2009. Among its objectives was to improve the position of Spanish universities in international rankings by 2015. The present work analyses the impact of CIEs on the ARWU-Shanghai Academic Ranking. The comparison between the average across the first three years of the CIE initiative (2009-11) and the last three (2013-15) reveals that the Spanish university system has notably improved its research performance, judging by the increase in average scores and the hike in positions. Universities coordinating CIE projects present a more stable evolution (an increase of 9% in scientific output) than those that don't (increase of 21%), resulting in a more homogeneous university system. Institutions with CIE projects comprising a single university achieve better positions in the rankings. Despite the context of the economic crisis, a tight timeframe and limited funding for the CIE initiative, the experience is found to have been positive in view of the evolution of Spanish universities in these rankings.
“…Para ello se suman los puntos obtenidos por cada anuncio y se normalizan utilizando raíces cuadradas para atemperar la diferencia entre elementos, como hace el Ranking de Shangai (Docampo, 2013). Este cálculo se hace cambiando el nivel de agregación para los diferentes rankings (anuncios, agencias y anunciantes), de tal forma que se le da valor 10.000 a: a) El anuncio que mayor número de premios ha recibido (ranking de anuncios); b) La agencia de publicidad que acapara mayor número de puntos sumando los valores de sus anuncios (ranking de agencias); c) La empresa anunciante cuyas piezas han recibido el mayor número de puntos (ranking de anunciantes).…”
Section: Cálculo Del Valor De Las Agenciasunclassified
Rafael Repiso es diplomado en biblioteconomía, licenciado en documentación y máster en evaluación científica. Miembro del grupo de investigación EC3, es profesor en la ESCO, Escuela Superior de Comunicación de Granada, centro adscrito a la Universidad de Gales.
ResumenSe presenta y describe el Ranking ESCO de agencias de publicidad, meta-producto que evalúa la calidad de las agencias a través de sus productos creativos y según una ponderación rigurosa de los premios que obtienen y los festivales en los que son galardonados. Se ha seleccionado una muestra de festivales clasificados en 4 categorías según su importancia nacional e internacional, considerando un período de carga de dos años para garantizar que entre cada edición exista un elemento de continuidad y otro de novedad. Este ranking pretende subsanar una manifiesta carencia en España respecto a otros países, al ofrecer no sólo una clasificación de las mejores empresas y trabajos publicitarios, sino también un análisis de la industria publicitaria española. Los resultados del ranking para 2012 registran 197 agencias, 611 anuncios y 359 anunciantes.
Palabras claveRanking, Agencias de publicidad, Ranking de publicidad, Premios de publicidad, Diseño de rankings.
Título: ESCO ranking of advertising agencies: description and results
AbstractThis paper presents and describes the ESCO Ranking of advertising agencies. The objective of this tool is to assess the quality of the agencies, based on their creative products and a rigorous evaluation of the various prizes received and the prestige of the festivals that granted them. For that purpose, festivals were classified into 4 categories based on their national and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.