2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200018080-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of radial pulse wave analysis in healthy subjects

Abstract: PWA gives estimates of several parameters characterizing the pressure load of central circulation and the wave reflection. The reproducibility of CSP and CSPTI is similar to that of PSP. CAI and the difference between PSP and CSP is not influenced by order of measurement, of visit or by investigator. Therefore, CAI is a more stable parameter than PSP measured by an oscillometric device. Since these parameters may contribute to a better assessment of cardiovascular risk, PWA might be used in prospective studies. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
60
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 This new technique is reproducible, noninvasive and increasingly used in clinical studies. 31,32 Both measures are closely correlated, 16,33 and PWV is an important determinant of augmentation index. However, both measures were derived using methods that are technically completely independent from each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 This new technique is reproducible, noninvasive and increasingly used in clinical studies. 31,32 Both measures are closely correlated, 16,33 and PWV is an important determinant of augmentation index. However, both measures were derived using methods that are technically completely independent from each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI in the aorta measured non-invasively by PWA is considered a reliable and reproducible marker [20][21][22] to assess the current status of the cardiovascular system. Its values reflect the timing of reflected pressure waves returning to the aorta and therefore aortic pulse wave velocity and arterial stiffness 23,24 as well as changes associated with the intensity of the reflected waves which depends on the vascular tone and properties of the small muscular arteries/ arterioles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Using magnitude-based inference [17] to estimate the sample size required to detect the smallest beneficial (or detrimental) in a cross-over study, with the maximum chances of a type 1 and 2 error set at 5% (i.e., very unlikely), approximately 8 participants are required to detect a 6 mmHg change (based on the smallest change reported in previous blood pressure studies. [18] We oversampled to account for the uncertainty with regards to the effect of fasting.…”
Section: Reliability Of Waveform Separation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%