2020
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of liver iron concentration estimates in MRI through R2* measurement determined by least‐squares curve fitting

Abstract: Measuring transverse relaxation rate (R2* = 1/T2*) via MRI allows for noninvasive evaluation of multiple clinical parameters, including liver iron concentration (LIC) and fat fraction. Both fat and iron contribute to diffuse liver disease when stored in excess in the liver. This liver damage leads to fibrosis and cirrhosis with an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver iron concentration is linearly related to R2* measurements using MRI. A phantom was constructed to assess R2* quantificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data would then typically contain local sequence variations, which influence reconstructed R 2 * and susceptibility maps. [34][35][36] Moreover, although previous largescale multisite studies included up to 10 sites, the number of subjects to test reproducibility (traveling heads) was only one or two healthy subjects. [28][29][30] The largest previous study with respect to the number of traveling heads included 10 subjects scanned in five sites at 7 T. 26 This study aimed to (1) assess QSM and R 2 * reproducibility in 24 traveling heads at three sites (all at 3 T) with two vendors (and three scanner models) using locally optimized nonharmonized data from the same 24 subjects collected using three independently optimized sequences, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data would then typically contain local sequence variations, which influence reconstructed R 2 * and susceptibility maps. [34][35][36] Moreover, although previous largescale multisite studies included up to 10 sites, the number of subjects to test reproducibility (traveling heads) was only one or two healthy subjects. [28][29][30] The largest previous study with respect to the number of traveling heads included 10 subjects scanned in five sites at 7 T. 26 This study aimed to (1) assess QSM and R 2 * reproducibility in 24 traveling heads at three sites (all at 3 T) with two vendors (and three scanner models) using locally optimized nonharmonized data from the same 24 subjects collected using three independently optimized sequences, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also beneficial to be able to pool multisite data acquired without the same standardized protocol retrospectively to form larger datasets of wider pathological and/or demographical coverage, such as maximizing age/demographical coverage in lifespan studies, or increasing the statistical power of specific under‐represented cohorts of a disorder, effect, or demographic. Data would then typically contain local sequence variations, which influence reconstructed R 2 * and susceptibility maps 34–36 . Moreover, although previous large‐scale multisite studies included up to 10 sites, the number of subjects to test reproducibility (traveling heads) was only one or two healthy subjects 28–30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%