2012
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of hepatic fat fraction measurement by magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Methods 2 and 3 accurately assess FF. Strong reproducibility across magnet type and strength render them suitable for use in multicenter trials and longitudinal assessments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of significant difference in the splenic FF supports the notion that slice thickness likely did not contribute to the effect seen for renal FF. Though not directly confirmed in this study, the difference in scanner models also is not expected to impact proton-density FF estimates based on previous multi-vendor, multi-platform reproducibility studies of hepatic steatosis (38,39). Lastly, the observed effect size (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The lack of significant difference in the splenic FF supports the notion that slice thickness likely did not contribute to the effect seen for renal FF. Though not directly confirmed in this study, the difference in scanner models also is not expected to impact proton-density FF estimates based on previous multi-vendor, multi-platform reproducibility studies of hepatic steatosis (38,39). Lastly, the observed effect size (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Third, our study was a single-center study and all our cases were scanned with a 3T scanner. However, recent studies have shown that M-MRI-PDFF is reproducible across MR scanners from different manufacturers and at different field strengths (32, 37), so our results are likely to be generalizable to other scanners and field strengths. Fourth, we did not assess C-MRI methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Pharmacodynamic and clinical effects were assessed by measuring alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total cholesterol, TGs, low-density lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), C-reactive protein and ferritin. Liver volume was assessed by MRI and hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a measure of lipid content, was assessed by MRI (multi-echo gradient-echo sequence imaging) or 1 H-MRS (if available)[1821]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%