1998
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of Functional Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Determining Hemispheric Language Lateralization

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Since functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (fTCD) allows convenient and fully automated quantification of language lateralization, it seems ideal for longitudinal studies of perfusion changes during deterioration as well as recovery of language functions. However, during serial examinations, the technical, stochastic, and physiological variabilities of cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV) have to be considered. Therefore, before fTCD is accepted as a tool for evaluation of ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
92
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
92
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies focused more on auditory stimulation, cognitive tasks, language, memory tests, and motor tasks (Klingelhöfer et al 1999,Stroobant andVingerhoets 2000). These studies were validated through direct comparison against the Wada test, which uses an anesthetic for lateral suspension of brain activity (Strauss et al 1985), and against fMRI establishing fTCD as a viable complementary tool for functional brain imaging (Binder et al 1996;Deppe et al 2000;Desmond et al 1995;Knecht et al 1998). Functional TCD has since been applied to the study of migraines (De Benedittis et al 1999;Backer et al 2001), stroke recovery (Bragoni et al 2000;Matteis et al 2003), Alzheimer's disease (Asil and Uzuner 2005), Parkinson's disease (Troisi et al 2002), Huntington's disease (Deckel and Cohen 2000) and schizophrenia (Sabri et al 2003;Feldmann et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focused more on auditory stimulation, cognitive tasks, language, memory tests, and motor tasks (Klingelhöfer et al 1999,Stroobant andVingerhoets 2000). These studies were validated through direct comparison against the Wada test, which uses an anesthetic for lateral suspension of brain activity (Strauss et al 1985), and against fMRI establishing fTCD as a viable complementary tool for functional brain imaging (Binder et al 1996;Deppe et al 2000;Desmond et al 1995;Knecht et al 1998). Functional TCD has since been applied to the study of migraines (De Benedittis et al 1999;Backer et al 2001), stroke recovery (Bragoni et al 2000;Matteis et al 2003), Alzheimer's disease (Asil and Uzuner 2005), Parkinson's disease (Troisi et al 2002), Huntington's disease (Deckel and Cohen 2000) and schizophrenia (Sabri et al 2003;Feldmann et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with TCD have been cross-validated by functional MRI (Schmidt et al, 1999), and reproducibility assessed (Knecht et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also of interest to note that even though the LI-V, depends on a number of variables that could have a wide range of values, it demonstrated an excellent repeatability in our study. Previously, Knecht et al (1998) reported good repeatability of a word production task in successive fTCD measurements, and good test-retest reliability was also reported in a fMRI study (Pujol et al, 1999). In contrast, unreliable test-retest repeatability of the results has been reported as one of the disadvantages of the Wada procedure (Grote et al, 1999;Meador and Loring, 1999;Bassel and Bradley, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, those tests, by being specific for the nondominant hemisphere, make it in fact 'dominant' for the function tested. In fTCD and fMRI studies, results are based on 'activation' (i.e., increase of blood flow velocity for fTCD and activated pixels for fMRI) and therefore most previous studies have mainly used widely accepted language specific tasks (Benson et al, 1999;Knecht et al, 1998;Lehericy et al, 2000). The study of FV fluctuations during the performance of successive specific for the nondominant hemisphere tasks could be an interesting avenue of future exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%