2001
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.114197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in healthy patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of this exaggerated response has been questioned. 2 The authors confirmed this finding when they found a reproducibility of only 41% in patients in at least 50% of tests and only 21% in all their stress tests.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The reproducibility of this exaggerated response has been questioned. 2 The authors confirmed this finding when they found a reproducibility of only 41% in patients in at least 50% of tests and only 21% in all their stress tests.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Second, reproducibility of Ex-BP was not evaluated in all patients. A previous report has suggested low reproducibility of Ex-BP 28. However, other reports have shown satisfactory BP reproducibility during the exercise test 29 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We defined ExBPR when SBP during exercise was ≥200 mm Hg, while other investigators used a threshold of 190 mm Hg for women and 210 mm Hg for men . However, there are varying definitions for ExSBP and we prefered to use an SBP value of 200 mm Hg as a cutpoint for both sexes as we used in our previous studies . We also analyzed the data using an SBP of 210 mm Hg as a cutpoint for the definition of ExBPR and we received the same results (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies failed to show an association between ExBPR and the development of hypertension and target organ damage or CV disease . Moreover, there is concern regarding the reproducibility of ExBPR, which questioned its prognostic significance …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%