2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of en-face Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for Macular Atrophy Area Evaluation in Juvenile Macular Degeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of the automated measurements also was assessed in our STGD1 cohort by computing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between SD-OCT scans performed within 1 week in 15 patients and was excellent (ICC = 0.994; 95% CI, 0.982–0.998). 26 Finally, since FAF was commonly adopted in STGD1 to assess macular atrophy area, 9 , 21 , 27 we compared the RPE lesion area measurements by SD-OCT to the FAF lesion area in the subset of STGD1 patients who underwent both examinations during the same visit. Since most patients underwent only SD-OCT and not FAF examination, only a relatively small number of cases ( n = 22) could be included in the comparison between the two techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of the automated measurements also was assessed in our STGD1 cohort by computing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between SD-OCT scans performed within 1 week in 15 patients and was excellent (ICC = 0.994; 95% CI, 0.982–0.998). 26 Finally, since FAF was commonly adopted in STGD1 to assess macular atrophy area, 9 , 21 , 27 we compared the RPE lesion area measurements by SD-OCT to the FAF lesion area in the subset of STGD1 patients who underwent both examinations during the same visit. Since most patients underwent only SD-OCT and not FAF examination, only a relatively small number of cases ( n = 22) could be included in the comparison between the two techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Further details about the automated algorithm and its application in STGD can be found elsewhere. [28][29][30][31] MP was performed by an automatic fundus-related perimeter (MP1 Microperimeter; Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy). The following parameters were used: a fixation target of 28 in diameter consisting of a red cross and a white, monochromatic background with a luminance of 1.27 cd/m 2 .…”
Section: Ophthalmologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%