2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001980170157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of DXA: Potential Impact on Serial Measurements and Misclassification of Osteoporosis

Abstract: The reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), based on 12 successive monthly determinations, was assessed in a group of 24 subjects (23 postmenopausal women, 1 man) using six trained operators. The variability (S2A) was calculated from both duplicate operator measurements and the standard error of estimate from nonparametric regression of the individual subject series. Robust estimates of SA from the 90th percentile of the sampling distribution of var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an increase in BMD to be clinically significant, there must be a change of 0.050 g/cm 2 (or a 4-7% increase) (Phillipov, Seaborn & Phillips, 2001;Phillips & Phillipov, 2006). Although the participants in the present study experienced a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in both the lumbar region of the spine (L1-L4) and the femur neck (p=0.00), the increase in BMD at the femur neck was the only area to have a clinically significant increase (9.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an increase in BMD to be clinically significant, there must be a change of 0.050 g/cm 2 (or a 4-7% increase) (Phillipov, Seaborn & Phillips, 2001;Phillips & Phillipov, 2006). Although the participants in the present study experienced a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in both the lumbar region of the spine (L1-L4) and the femur neck (p=0.00), the increase in BMD at the femur neck was the only area to have a clinically significant increase (9.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, whereas such models enable statistical inference for the effect of several covariates on the mean change in BMD, statistical inference cannot be easily performed on the residual SD, and hence judgment on factors affecting precision remains qualitative. A different approach has been taken to analyze precision by Phillipov et al (26) They performed a nonparametric linear regression on 12 serial BMD measurements in 24 subjects. They were able to perform statistical inference (e.g., confidence interval) on the components of the overall variance using bootstrap techniques and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because 26.6% of women had initial BMDs performed by a pencil-beamed device, we attempted to make corrections when necessary on subsequent BMDs performed by fan-beamed devices. 16 We classified women using the lowest available T score at either the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine into the following categories: normal (T scores > −1.0), mild osteopenia (T scores −1.0 to −1.49), moderate osteopenia (T scores −1.5 to —1.99), and severe osteopenia (T scores −2.0 to −2.49). Because all three sites were not always reported, the most frequent sites available for review were the spine plus total hip (54.6%), spine plus total hip and femoral neck (37.8%), and spine plus femoral neck (4.74%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%