2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-014-1342-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging in normal subjects: an evaluation of different gradient sampling schemes and registration algorithm

Abstract: Our results suggest that the choice of DTI acquisition protocol and post-processing methods can influence the accurate estimation and reproducibility of DTI measurements and should be considered carefully for clinical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), the sample size, the type of instrument for assessing personality dimensions scores and the degree of objectiveness of the self-assessment, the choice of the imaging protocol and of the image preprocessing methods and parameters (Tardif et al, 2009;Liu X et al, 2014). Also the analysis method and the parameters considered in the model to detect the effects of interest, as well as the choice of atlas (Ota et al, 2014) have been shown to produce differences in results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…), the sample size, the type of instrument for assessing personality dimensions scores and the degree of objectiveness of the self-assessment, the choice of the imaging protocol and of the image preprocessing methods and parameters (Tardif et al, 2009;Liu X et al, 2014). Also the analysis method and the parameters considered in the model to detect the effects of interest, as well as the choice of atlas (Ota et al, 2014) have been shown to produce differences in results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the future, we will further evaluate the different registration approaches for preneurosurgical applications and determine the best strategy for routine clinical use. 55 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An a posteriori approach alternative to numerical analysis is to evaluate the reproducibility and noisiness of DTI in healthy conditions, either qualitatively, assessing the visual contrast in DTI maps [28], or quantitatively, measuring the variability among different measures in control groups [29]. This may have a more limited impact because it requires the acquisition of real data in a necessarily finite number of conditions, but has the advantage of evaluating the ultimate output of diffusion without any a priori assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have a more limited impact because it requires the acquisition of real data in a necessarily finite number of conditions, but has the advantage of evaluating the ultimate output of diffusion without any a priori assumption. However, the comparison of SC DTI acquisition protocols was performed only for humans [28,29] and not for small animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%