2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of a semi-automatic method for 6-point vertebral morphometry in a multi-centre trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, data on comorbidities are based on patients' reports without any further validation of objectivity. Finally, the fact that in this study no intraobserver repeatability testing was carried out, the accuracy in the centralized evaluation of vertebral deformities was assured by the use of a reproducible semiautomatic method recently validated by one of the authors (GG) [11]. The prevalence of unrecognized vertebral fractures (23%) in our study was higher than that observed in previous studies [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, data on comorbidities are based on patients' reports without any further validation of objectivity. Finally, the fact that in this study no intraobserver repeatability testing was carried out, the accuracy in the centralized evaluation of vertebral deformities was assured by the use of a reproducible semiautomatic method recently validated by one of the authors (GG) [11]. The prevalence of unrecognized vertebral fractures (23%) in our study was higher than that observed in previous studies [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The characteristics and performance of MorphoXpress have been reported in detail in a recent paper by one of the authors (GG) [11]. In brief, MorphoXpress operates as follows: analysis is initialized by the manual targeting of the centers of upper and lower vertebrae to be analyzed.…”
Section: Assessment Of Vertebral Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical correlation analysis showed that the resulting height of the 3D model for the observed vertebral body adequately represents the anterior, central, and posterior heights that were manually measured in 2D from the corresponding mid-sagittal CT cross section of the same vertebral body. The relatively small differences can be attributed to the accuracy in aligning the 3D model to vertebral bodies in 3D images and to the accuracy in manually identifying the anatomical points that define the three vertebral body heights in 2D images [35]. Moreover, it can be observed that the height, width, and length of the resulting 3D model for different segments of normal vertebral bodies correspond to the values reported in statistical studies of quantitative 3D vertebral anatomy [31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…• Anteroposterior and lateral radiography of the thoracic and lumbar spine was used to identify morphometrically detectable vertebral fractures. Six points defining the anterior, middle, and posterior heights were marked on each vertebra using a computed quantitative morphometer (MorphoXpress) [15]. The greatest percent reduction in height (Hpr) of the vertebral bodies was recorded, and the mean Hpr of the thoracic (T5-T12) and lumbar (L1-L4) spine were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%