2019
DOI: 10.3390/nu11092183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of A Non-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (62-Item FFQ-6) and PCA-Driven Dietary Pattern Identification in 13–21-Year-Old Females

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reproducibility of a non-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (acronym: 62-item FFQ-6) and the possibility of identifying dietary patterns (DPs) in 13–21-year-old females. The study involved 97 females within three age groups: 13–15, 16–18, and 19–21 years, including 31, 38, and 28 subjects, respectively. The questionnaire was completed twice with a two-week interval (test and retest). For the total sample, using a principal component analysis (PCA), t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may indicate better test-retest reproducibility of the questionnaire in terms of dietary behaviors in children and adolescents with stable but restrictive eating habits (consuming key foods, healthy or unhealthy, with low frequency and/or consuming only a few selected foods with higher frequency). Better test-retest reproducibility of FFQs for foods consumed rarely or never has been reported in other studies [15,16,31]. The differences between both administrations of the questionnaire were more scattered in adolescents than in children, and the most between the adolescent's test and parent's test, which confirms the results of other statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings may indicate better test-retest reproducibility of the questionnaire in terms of dietary behaviors in children and adolescents with stable but restrictive eating habits (consuming key foods, healthy or unhealthy, with low frequency and/or consuming only a few selected foods with higher frequency). Better test-retest reproducibility of FFQs for foods consumed rarely or never has been reported in other studies [15,16,31]. The differences between both administrations of the questionnaire were more scattered in adolescents than in children, and the most between the adolescent's test and parent's test, which confirms the results of other statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) in Poland for which reproducibility or relative validity among children or adolescents is assessed [14][15][16]. The relative validity of a semi-quantitative FFQ against repeated 24-h dietary recalls was evaluated in Polish children aged 3 years old, showing overestimation of energy and nutrient intake by the FFQ (e.g., median of differences in energy intake between the two methods was 255.4 kcal, and in the range of 7.0-31.0 g for intake of macronutrients) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two validated food frequency questionnaires were used to assess diet quality. For data-driven dietary pattern analysis (a posteriori approach), data was collected using validated for Polish population food frequency questionnaire (FFQ-6) [29]; the self-administered version of FFQ-6 was used. The questionnaire was previously used in various populations [30][31][32], with the reproducibility being recently described in detail elsewhere [29].…”
Section: Diet Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary data were collected from the participants using a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ-6) [29]. The FFQ-6 tool consists of a list of 62 food items and evaluates the frequency of food consumption over the last 12 months.…”
Section: Frequency Of Food Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%