1996
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility in the Measurement of Atlanto-occipital Instability in Children With Down Syndrome

Abstract: Measurement of atlanto-occipital translation by any of these methods is not reproducible. Although the technique by Wiesel and Rothman is the easiest to apply, confirmation of instability with magnetic resonance imaging should guide management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly useful for the diagnosis of atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) [2,[5][6][7][8]11]. A strong correlation between the AOD and Powers ratio has been supported by both experimental and clinical studies using various methods including X-ray, CT and threedimensional CT [2,7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly useful for the diagnosis of atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) [2,[5][6][7][8]11]. A strong correlation between the AOD and Powers ratio has been supported by both experimental and clinical studies using various methods including X-ray, CT and threedimensional CT [2,7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-line method, condylar gap and Harris method [2,6,7]. However, very few of them have focused on intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic radiographic screening for instability is of unproven value [79,86]. A regular clinical assessment is much more helpful.…”
Section: Down Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axial separation is prevented between C1 and C2, because of the strong constraint by the transverse ligament positioned behind a normally configured dens. Any deformity to the dens (such as that found in Downs syndrome) 24 could potentially reduce upper cervical stability, produce excessive separation, and merit avoiding any therapeutic cervical traction maneuvers. In addition, a gap, which can be appreciated on sagittal view X‐ray between the dens and the anterior arch of C1, is full of cartilage and should not exceed 3 mm, even during cervical flexion or extension.…”
Section: Pathoanatomymentioning
confidence: 99%