2016
DOI: 10.2319/120715-833.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional (3-D) stereophogrammetric images. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four stereophotogrammetric images were taken and 19 soft tissue points were identified. The images were obtained using the 3-DMD Face (3-DMD TM Ltd, Atlanta, Ga) system. Two examiners marked 34 images manually with a mouse-driven cursor 4 weeks apart. Intraexaminer marking differences were calculated and classified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These were all found to be consistently very high, both in relation to the 2 readings on each registration, and also as a result of when the 2 readings were combined for the first registration and compared to those of the second registration. In a study of reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on facial images obtained from a stereophotogrammetry technique, intraclass correlation coefficients were found to be good for repeated readings by 2 examiners . Furthermore, in the present study paired t‐tests between the repeated readings showed no significant differences in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These were all found to be consistently very high, both in relation to the 2 readings on each registration, and also as a result of when the 2 readings were combined for the first registration and compared to those of the second registration. In a study of reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on facial images obtained from a stereophotogrammetry technique, intraclass correlation coefficients were found to be good for repeated readings by 2 examiners . Furthermore, in the present study paired t‐tests between the repeated readings showed no significant differences in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This system has previously demonstrated high accuracy, reliability and reproducibility 23 . Soft‐tissue landmarks used in three‐dimensional stereophotogrammetry and laser scanning are shown to have high reliability and moderate but clinically acceptable reproducibility, and the difference between the landmarks is less than 1 mm between repeated markings 24,25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies in the literature have shown that the 3dMD face system is the right tool for linear and surface measurements with potentially wide applications in orthodontics, surgical treatment planning, and treatment evaluation. In many studies, it has been reported that this system gives more accurate results in terms of reliability and reproducibility compared to direct anthropometric measurements and 2D facial photographs [19][20][21] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%