2013
DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.v34i2.1571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibilidad de pruebas serológicas para el diagnóstico de infección por Trypanosoma cruzi en gestantes de zona endémica de Santander, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in an analysis of the external quality evaluation program carried out during 15 years in Chile, it was reported that the sensitivity of the total ELISA methods was in the range of 96.9 % to 100 % with a specificity that oscillated between 76.4 % and 100 %. As for recombinant ELISA methods, the sensitivity was 100 %, with a specificity ranging from 94 % to 98.8 %, ranges in which our results are found 23 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…On the other hand, in an analysis of the external quality evaluation program carried out during 15 years in Chile, it was reported that the sensitivity of the total ELISA methods was in the range of 96.9 % to 100 % with a specificity that oscillated between 76.4 % and 100 %. As for recombinant ELISA methods, the sensitivity was 100 %, with a specificity ranging from 94 % to 98.8 %, ranges in which our results are found 23 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, a recent study in Colombia compared the intra-reproducibility of serological tests for identification of T. cruzi infection in pregnant women (ELISA, IFI and indirect hemagglutination-HAI in serum and ELISA on filter paper). This study concluded that the ELISA reproducibility in serum was 0.98, higher than the reproducibility of the other serological tests and well above the ELISA reproducibility on filter paper, which was 0.55 25 . the Stat-Pack test in population from 5 to 18 years of age in the department of Casanare, with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 98% when compared with conventional serological tests and 46.7% when compared to ELISA on filter paper, showing a lower sensitivity in relation to the studies 31 .…”
Section: Section 2 Diagnosis In Pregnant Womenmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In blood bank screening, the most commonly-used methods are those based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays (CMIA), with more complex techniques, such as indirect immunofluorescence (IFI) and immunoblotting, generally being used for confirmatory purposes. Previously, high specificity and sensitivity levels (up to 95% of IFI standards) have been reported for ELISA and CMIA assays, as well as a high reproducibility of ELISA, IFI, and indirect hemagglutination (IHA) (29,30), but they also exhibit limitations that should be considered and analyzed through comparative studies with modern complementary techniques (29). For example, the false seropositive results reported in these tests have been explained by the crossreactivity with other hemoflagelate protozoa such as Leishmania spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%