2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00278
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reprocessing vs direct disposal of used nuclear fuels: The environmental impacts of future scenarios for the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar LCA studies have been reported recently by Paulillo and coworkers [61,62], see Table 6 for the comparison. An initial study of the UK closed cycle, with the reprocessing of spent AGR fuel in Thorp but with the storage of products rather than recycling, came to several conclusions [61].…”
Section: Nuclear Fuel Cycle Lcasupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar LCA studies have been reported recently by Paulillo and coworkers [61,62], see Table 6 for the comparison. An initial study of the UK closed cycle, with the reprocessing of spent AGR fuel in Thorp but with the storage of products rather than recycling, came to several conclusions [61].…”
Section: Nuclear Fuel Cycle Lcasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…To address this gap, Poinssot and coworkers have produced a series of papers using the French nuclear fuel cycle as an example of applying an LCA approach to this question [22,23,49,50]. These studies are complemented by recent reports from Paullilo and coworkers based on fuel cycle experience in the United Kingdom [61,62]. The fuel cycles and indicators used to assess the environmental footprints in both French and UK studies are similar-see Table 6.…”
Section: Nuclear Fuel Cycle Lcamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The considerable challenge of capturing iodine from the off-gas stream has been approached using many different chemical methods, including solution-based processes and solid sorbents. , In regard to sorbent substrates, several viable candidate materials have been identified, such as zeolites, silica aerogels, and carbon-based materials. Silica aerogels offer promising properties as sorbent, such as easy functionalization, pore-tunability, , and the ability to be transformed into a chemically and mechanically durable waste form . Unfortunately, the friable nature of the nanostructured silica skeleton of these materials complicates their deployment as iodine off-gas adsorbents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%