2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reprocessing of deep seismic reflection data from the North German Basin with the Common Reflection Surface stack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, minimum and maximum values fixed at 100 m (0.1 s twt) and 2,000 m (5.0 s twt) for the ZO aperture and at 5 m (0.2 s twt) and 15,000 m (5.0 s twt) for the CMP aperture to get the best coherency section. Similar values for the coherency criteria are also reported for several data sets from different geological provinces (e.g., Yoon et al, 2009). The conventional CMP processing is also carried out using the flow chart (Steps I and III) shown in Figure 2, and a stack section is prepared.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, minimum and maximum values fixed at 100 m (0.1 s twt) and 2,000 m (5.0 s twt) for the ZO aperture and at 5 m (0.2 s twt) and 15,000 m (5.0 s twt) for the CMP aperture to get the best coherency section. Similar values for the coherency criteria are also reported for several data sets from different geological provinces (e.g., Yoon et al, 2009). The conventional CMP processing is also carried out using the flow chart (Steps I and III) shown in Figure 2, and a stack section is prepared.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, only a few applications are also found in the crustal structure and tectonics studies (e.g. Mandal et al, 2014, Mandal et al, 2013, Menyoli et al, 2004, Yoon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Deep Crustal Seismic Reflection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRS stack is a multiparameter stacking technique, which does not depend directly on stacking velocity. Mathematically, the CRS operator can be described as a hyperbolic second‐order Taylor expansion [ Mann et al ., ; Yoon et al ., ], given by t2xmh=()t0+2sinnormalαv0()xmx02+2t0cos2αv0xmx02RN+h2RNIPwhere h is the half‐offset between the source and the receiver, x m is the source/receiver midpoint, and x 0 is the emergence location of the zero‐offset (ZO) rays at the surface (Figure ). The respective zero‐offset sample to which equation is applied is denoted by P 0 = ( x 0 , t 0 ).…”
Section: Review Of the Crs Stack Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such heterogeneous structures lead to incorrect velocity models of the subsurface. In addition, velocity analysis also becomes difficult due to small source‐receiver offset compared with the target depth in deep crustal seismic reflection data [ Yoon et al ., ]. Inadequate knowledge of deep crustal velocities, including their lateral variations, degrades the effectiveness of the common midpoint stacking method [ Mooney and Meissner , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation