2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reprint of “Neurofeedback and standard pharmacological intervention in ADHD: A randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up”

Abstract: The present study is a randomized controlled trial that aims to evaluate the efficacy of Neurofeedback compared to standard pharmacological intervention in the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The final sample consisted of 23 children with ADHD (11 boys and 12 girls, 7-14 years old). Participants carried out 40 theta/beta training sessions or received methylphenidate. Behavioral rating scales were completed by fathers, mothers, and teachers at pre-, post-treatment, two-, and six-mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded one study with a non-standard EEG-NF protocol (Arnold et al, 2013), five studies with non-semi-active or sham-NF control groups (i.e., treatment as usual or methylphenidate) (Li et al, 2013; Ogrim and Hestad, 2013; Bink et al, 2014; Meisel et al, 2014) and one study with no available probably blinded assessment data (Duric et al, 2012). Two studies were excluded because there were secondary analyses of already included RCTs (Steiner et al, 2014a; Vollebregt et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded one study with a non-standard EEG-NF protocol (Arnold et al, 2013), five studies with non-semi-active or sham-NF control groups (i.e., treatment as usual or methylphenidate) (Li et al, 2013; Ogrim and Hestad, 2013; Bink et al, 2014; Meisel et al, 2014) and one study with no available probably blinded assessment data (Duric et al, 2012). Two studies were excluded because there were secondary analyses of already included RCTs (Steiner et al, 2014a; Vollebregt et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the CNV as an event-related potential is believed to reflect the underlying resource allocation of neural circuits during cognitive preparation, the current preliminary findings map on to existing knowledge on the correlates of successful NF training regulation in young people with ADHD 42. In particular, because a more general slowing in EEG-related brain activity and also a decline in event-related potential amplitudes such as the CNV can be detected in patients with ADHD of different age groups,43 the current findings are in-line with previous research suggesting a cortical hypoarousal in patients with ADHD. This cortical hypoarousal can be related to changes in reaction time, which can be clinically assessed through neuropsychological test batteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Active control conditions compare two treatment methods that do have an effect on ADHD-related symptoms, for example, theta/beta with SCP NF23 or pharmacological treatments to NF 43,44. Placebo-controlled studies are considered to be the scientific gold standard, but they are difficult to conduct for NF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, neurofeedback efficacy for the inattention dimension was correlated with the number of training sessions [82] and seemed to be maintained over time [85]. Comparison between the neurofeedback training and pharmacological treatment effects showed that medication was more effective in improving clinical symptoms [86-87] or cognitive function [88], and neurofeedback was more effective for improving academic performance [89]. …”
Section: Application Of Bcis As An Intervention In Psychiatric Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%