2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repression of Flowering by the miR172 Target SMZ

Abstract: The flowering repressors SMZ and FLM, members of the AP-2 and MADS domain transcription factor families, unexpectedly work together to regulate flowering time via their effects on expression of the FT gene.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
400
3
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(424 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
13
400
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant downregulation in miR172 targets, AP2s seems unusual as AP2s do not respond to miR172 expression significantly during development 44,45 . It has been proposed that miR172 regulation of its targets is a balanced result of translation suppression 44,45 , transcript cleavage 43,44,46,47 and self-feedback regulation 47 of these targets 46 . A recent study showed that this balance may be changed under stress; it was found that miR172 targets, SMZ and TOE2 increased significantly in expression at 16°C, correlating with a significant decrease in miR172 (ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant downregulation in miR172 targets, AP2s seems unusual as AP2s do not respond to miR172 expression significantly during development 44,45 . It has been proposed that miR172 regulation of its targets is a balanced result of translation suppression 44,45 , transcript cleavage 43,44,46,47 and self-feedback regulation 47 of these targets 46 . A recent study showed that this balance may be changed under stress; it was found that miR172 targets, SMZ and TOE2 increased significantly in expression at 16°C, correlating with a significant decrease in miR172 (ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under favorable conditions, light signaling and the circadian clock coordinately control the activity of CO, which directly regulates the transcription of FT to promote flowering (Suárez-López et al, 2001;An et al, 2004;Imaizumi et al, 2005;Sawa et al, 2007;Fornara et al, 2009). On the other hand, the expression of FT is also negatively regulated by several transcriptional repressors, such as FLOWERING LOCUS C (Helliwell et al, 2006;Searle et al, 2006), SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (Lee et al, 2007), TEMPRANILLO1 (Castillejo and Pelaz, 2008), and SCHLAFMŰTZE (SMZ) (Mathieu et al, 2009). Under unfavorable conditions for flowering or during the juvenile developmental phases, these repressors, as well as their related transcriptional regulators, bind to specific cis-elements in the FT locus and repress its expression to prevent precocious flowering (Song et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An age-sensing pathway that involves two microRNAs, miR156 and miR172, and their respective transcription factor targets, SQUAMOSA BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) and APETALA2-LIKE (AP2-like) proteins, ensures that flowering does not happen until the plant is mature (Huijser and Schmid, 2011). As the plant ages, declining levels of miR156 allows SPL transcripts to accumulate and promote flowering, while increasing levels of miR172 relieves the floral inhibition caused by AP2-like genes (Mathieu et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009;Hyun et al, 2016). A number of MADS-box proteins form complexes that inhibit flowering by repressing the expression of floral inducers, including FT and SOC1 (Hartmann et al, 2000;Lee et al, 2007;Li et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%