1990
DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.7.4.453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repression, accessibility, and the translation of private experience.

Abstract: associative connections have been established with other contents in memory. Thus, a greater portion of private experience is preconsciously available than would be suggested by the deficits approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly weaker result was recently proved in [21] and argues that for almost all α and β one can find two positive constants C i , i = 1, 2 such that C 1 t 3 ≤ N(t) ≤ C 2 t 3 . Moreover, a similar result is known in rational polygonal billiards [22].…”
Section: Topological Complexity Of the Triangle Mapmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A slightly weaker result was recently proved in [21] and argues that for almost all α and β one can find two positive constants C i , i = 1, 2 such that C 1 t 3 ≤ N(t) ≤ C 2 t 3 . Moreover, a similar result is known in rational polygonal billiards [22].…”
Section: Topological Complexity Of the Triangle Mapmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, repressors and nonrepressors may actually encode and experience the same amount of unpleasant affect when it is occurring, but the repressors' memories for those unpleasant emotions may diminish over time. Theoretically, repression can occur at any point in the encoding or retrieval process (Bonanno, 1990). In short, from the current literature it is difficult to know whether the repression effect on recalling unpleasant affect is due to diminished encoding of the affect from the unpleasant experience, inhibited recall of the affect, or some combination of both processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas about dissociation between enactive and representational memory systems are closely linked to other models of memory that see ‘repression’ as a form of disconnection rather than banishment of memory content. Bonanno (1990, p. 458) described Bruner’s depiction of a developmental tri‐partite model of enactive , imagistic and conceptual remembering with enactive memory associated with motoric–action sequences, followed by imagistic memories that rely primarily on visual and other sensory imagery, and lastly, conceptual memories based in language. Bruner’s framework was adopted by Geller and colleagues who looked at how patients internalized images of their therapists in one or more of these memorial forms (Geller et al ., 1981–82).…”
Section: Four Assumptions Of the Loewaldian And Sms Models Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruner’s framework was adopted by Geller and colleagues who looked at how patients internalized images of their therapists in one or more of these memorial forms (Geller et al ., 1981–82). Bonanno (1990) goes on to discuss how discontinuities of encoding, storage, and/or retrieval of memories in contrasting modes within the tri‐partite system might provide insight into how and why individuals lack accessibility to important emotional memories from their lives. Similar to Loewald, he endorses the creative use of metaphor within therapeutic dialogue as a way of bridging the imagistic–sensory world of enactive remembering and the domain of meaning associated with representational processing.…”
Section: Four Assumptions Of the Loewaldian And Sms Models Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%